MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/10870547231161534

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of attention disorders · 2023

Pragmatic Deficits in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kessler Paige B, Ikuta Toshikazu

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

While poorer pragmatic language skills have been found in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) populations, there has been no conclusive evidence of this. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of pragmatic language abilities in ADHD populations to definitively demonstrate the extent of pragmatic language deficits in these populations as compared to typically developing (TD) populations.

METHODS

Studies were identified using the search terms ((attention deficit) OR (adhd)) AND (pragmatics), and those studies were screened and reviewed for inclusion criteria, descriptive information, and outcome variables in order to conduct a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies (5,772 participants) met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis indicated that ADHD populations exhibited significantly poorer pragmatic language skills than TD populations, with a very large overall effect size of -1.55. These results indicate that pragmatic language is significantly impaired in ADHD populations.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that pragmatic language skills may deserve greater surveillance considering the importance of pragmatic language in socio-emotional development, daily life, and academic success.

Для цитирования: Kessler Paige B, Ikuta Toshikazu. Pragmatic Deficits in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Journal of attention disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/10870547231161534.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.