MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ca.23715

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2020

Pyramidal weakness: Is it time to retire the term?

Castle-Kirszbaum Mendel, Goldschlager Tony

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Pyramidal weakness, that is, the weakness that preferentially spares the antigravity muscles, is considered an integral part of the upper motor neuron syndrome. Despite its name, pyramidal weakness has very little to do with the pyramidal tract, and preeminent texts on neurology, neuroanatomy, and clinical examination differ considerably in their descriptions and localization of this enigmatic finding. Evidence from human and nonhuman primate studies demonstrates that lesions confined only to the corticospinal (pyramidal) tract cause significant deficits in fine motor control of the hand, but do not cause posturing or patterned weakness of the extremities. Lesioning of the corticofugal fibers, particularly the corticoreticular and corticopontine tracts, leads to dysbalanced output from reticulospinal, and vestibulospinal systems, which along with changes in rubrospinal tract output balance, probably accounts for the pyramidal weakness pattern. Importantly, this would delineate that pyramidal weakness could only be incited by lesions above the brainstem. It has also been suggested that the inherently greater strength of the antigravity musculature is the substrate for pyramidal weakness, independent of any preferential motor innervation. These hypotheses require further testing in myometric studies with carefully selected participants.

Для цитирования: Castle-Kirszbaum Mendel, Goldschlager Tony. Pyramidal weakness: Is it time to retire the term?. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2020. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23715.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.