The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2003
Evaluation of fusidic acid in therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus meningitis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Østergaard Christian, Yieng-Kow Runa Vavia, Knudsen Jenny Dahl, Frimodt-Møller Niels, Espersen Frank
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Combination therapy that includes fusidic acid, an antimicrobial agent highly active against staphylococci, has been recommended in the treatment of patients with Staphylococcus aureus meningitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, CSF bactericidal and anti-inflammatory properties of fusidic acid.
METHODS: The pharmacokinetics, treatment efficacy and parameters of the meningeal inflammatory response were studied in rabbits, using an experimental meningitis model against S. aureus (MICs of fusidic acid and methicillin were 0.125 and 1 mg/L, respectively).
RESULTS: Fusidic acid entered the CSF, with peak values within 0.5-1 h of the intravenous bolus injection/infusion and with a percentage penetration (AUCCSF/AUCserum) into uninfected and purulent CSF of 1.9% +/- 0.7 and 4.5% +/- 0.7, respectively. Rabbits treated with antibiotics [fusidic acid 80 mg/kg/6 h (n = 6), methicillin 80 mg/kg/3 h (n = 7) and the two combined (n = 6)] had significantly higher bacterial kill rates than untreated controls (n = 6, P < 0.05). Combination therapy was less effective, with significantly less killing after 6 h of treatment than methicillin alone (P < 0.05). CSF white blood cells and CSF levels of interleukin-8 (IL-8), glucose, lactate and protein were altered during staphylococcal meningitis, but with no significant difference between antibiotic-treated and untreated rabbits.
CONCLUSIONS: Antagonism between methicillin and fusidic acid was observed in staphylococcal meningitis.
METHODS: The pharmacokinetics, treatment efficacy and parameters of the meningeal inflammatory response were studied in rabbits, using an experimental meningitis model against S. aureus (MICs of fusidic acid and methicillin were 0.125 and 1 mg/L, respectively).
RESULTS: Fusidic acid entered the CSF, with peak values within 0.5-1 h of the intravenous bolus injection/infusion and with a percentage penetration (AUCCSF/AUCserum) into uninfected and purulent CSF of 1.9% +/- 0.7 and 4.5% +/- 0.7, respectively. Rabbits treated with antibiotics [fusidic acid 80 mg/kg/6 h (n = 6), methicillin 80 mg/kg/3 h (n = 7) and the two combined (n = 6)] had significantly higher bacterial kill rates than untreated controls (n = 6, P < 0.05). Combination therapy was less effective, with significantly less killing after 6 h of treatment than methicillin alone (P < 0.05). CSF white blood cells and CSF levels of interleukin-8 (IL-8), glucose, lactate and protein were altered during staphylococcal meningitis, but with no significant difference between antibiotic-treated and untreated rabbits.
CONCLUSIONS: Antagonism between methicillin and fusidic acid was observed in staphylococcal meningitis.