Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
4D Lips Technique Based on Anatomy for Naturalization.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kichler Melina, Barros Marta, de Freitas Carolina, Viana Renata, Nogueira Marcelle, Bussade Maria
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lip augmentation has become a cornerstone of aesthetic procedures, particularly among younger patients seeking to enhance their natural lip features. A precise anatomical approach is essential to achieve balanced, natural-looking results while minimizing the risk of complications. This study introduced the 4D Lips technique, a multiphasic hyaluronic acid filler method designed to enhance lip shape while respecting anatomical landmarks. The technique is guided by 4 fundamental principles-dimension, distribution, dynamics, and desire-to ensure harmonious and individualized outcomes.
METHODS: Ten female patients underwent lip augmentation using a combination of subtechniques, including tubercle marking, vertical elongation, and vermilion border eversion. Two hyaluronic acid fillers with distinct viscoelastic properties were used: one with medium G' for structural support and another with low G' for contour refinement. Patient satisfaction and safety outcomes were systematically evaluated.
RESULTS: All patients reported satisfaction with the natural appearance of their enhanced lips. Mild and transient side effects, such as swelling, were observed and resolved spontaneously within a few days. No major complications were recorded. The structured, anatomy-based approach allowed for precise volumization, refined contouring, and preservation of natural lip dynamics.
CONCLUSIONS: The 4D Lips technique underscores the value of an anatomy-informed and personalized approach to lip augmentation. By combining structural enhancement with a patient-centered perspective, this method achieves high satisfaction rates and a favorable safety profile. Nonetheless, the limitations of the study, including the small sample size, absence of a control group, and lack of long-term follow-up, warrant further investigation to validate these findings.
METHODS: Ten female patients underwent lip augmentation using a combination of subtechniques, including tubercle marking, vertical elongation, and vermilion border eversion. Two hyaluronic acid fillers with distinct viscoelastic properties were used: one with medium G' for structural support and another with low G' for contour refinement. Patient satisfaction and safety outcomes were systematically evaluated.
RESULTS: All patients reported satisfaction with the natural appearance of their enhanced lips. Mild and transient side effects, such as swelling, were observed and resolved spontaneously within a few days. No major complications were recorded. The structured, anatomy-based approach allowed for precise volumization, refined contouring, and preservation of natural lip dynamics.
CONCLUSIONS: The 4D Lips technique underscores the value of an anatomy-informed and personalized approach to lip augmentation. By combining structural enhancement with a patient-centered perspective, this method achieves high satisfaction rates and a favorable safety profile. Nonetheless, the limitations of the study, including the small sample size, absence of a control group, and lack of long-term follow-up, warrant further investigation to validate these findings.