Journal of translational medicine · 2024
Towards clinical translation of urinary vitronectin for non-invasive detection and monitoring of renal fibrosis in kidney transplant patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clos-Sansalvador Marta, Taco Omar, Rodríguez-Martínez Paula, Garcia Sergio G, Font-Morón Miriam, Bover Jordi, Vila-Santandreu Anna, Franquesa Marcella, Juega Javier, Borràs Francesc E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is a critical factor in the prognosis of kidney health. Currently, IFTA quantitation in kidney biopsy samples is crucial for diagnosis and assessing disease severity, but the available non-invasive biomarkers are not satisfactory. Proteomic studies identified urinary vitronectin (VTN) as a potential biomarker for kidney fibrosis. As mass spectrometry techniques are not practical for use in clinical settings, we tested whether evaluation of urinary VTN levels through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can help monitor fibrotic changes in kidney transplant recipients and prove the clinical viability of the assay.
METHODS: A total of 58 kidney transplant (KTx) patients who underwent renal biopsy were included in the study. Patients were categorized into two groups referred as no fibrosis (0%) or with fibrosis (≥ 5%) based on their histological findings. In a subsequent/follow-up analysis, the time elapsed from transplantation was also considered. The urinary levels of VTN were measured using ELISA.
RESULTS: VTN (p = 0.0180) and VTN normalized by urinary creatinine levels (p = 0.0037), were significantly increased in patients with fibrotic grafts. When focusing on patients with long-term grafts (> 3 years from transplantation, n = 36), VTN exhibited superior potential in identifying fibrotic grafts compared to albuminuria (VTN p = 0.0040 vs. albuminuria p = 0.0132). Importantly, in this group, while albuminuria correctly identified 71% of fibrotic patients, the combination of VTN plus albuminuria correctly classified 89% of fibrotic grafts detected by renal biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: VTN has emerged as a valid indicator of renal fibrosis. Of interest, urinary levels of VTN in combination with conventional clinical parameters (such as albuminuria) significantly improved the non-invasive detection of renal fibrosis in kidney transplant patients.
METHODS: A total of 58 kidney transplant (KTx) patients who underwent renal biopsy were included in the study. Patients were categorized into two groups referred as no fibrosis (0%) or with fibrosis (≥ 5%) based on their histological findings. In a subsequent/follow-up analysis, the time elapsed from transplantation was also considered. The urinary levels of VTN were measured using ELISA.
RESULTS: VTN (p = 0.0180) and VTN normalized by urinary creatinine levels (p = 0.0037), were significantly increased in patients with fibrotic grafts. When focusing on patients with long-term grafts (> 3 years from transplantation, n = 36), VTN exhibited superior potential in identifying fibrotic grafts compared to albuminuria (VTN p = 0.0040 vs. albuminuria p = 0.0132). Importantly, in this group, while albuminuria correctly identified 71% of fibrotic patients, the combination of VTN plus albuminuria correctly classified 89% of fibrotic grafts detected by renal biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: VTN has emerged as a valid indicator of renal fibrosis. Of interest, urinary levels of VTN in combination with conventional clinical parameters (such as albuminuria) significantly improved the non-invasive detection of renal fibrosis in kidney transplant patients.