MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0974-620x.116643

Медицинская библиотека · Oman journal of ophthalmology · 2013

A comparative study of two methods of optic disc evaluation in patients of glaucoma.

Chandra Anuradha, Bandyopadhyay Arun Kumar, Bhaduri Gautam

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is a progressive disorder and requires serial evaluation in order to monitor disease progression and optimize therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between each of cup/disc (C/D) ratio and the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and global indices in Humphrey field analyzer II (HFA II).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 50 patients diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma were examined to grade DDLS score and C/D ratio. The average (avg) RNFL was obtained using the Fast RNFL protocol on optical coherence tomography (OCT) (4.0.2 Carl Zeiss). HFA II Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2 visual fields were obtained within 1 month of clinical examination. The correlation of C/D ratio with avg RNFL thickness, Mean deviation and Pattern standard deviation was calculated by Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Similar coefficients were obtained for DDLS.

RESULTS

The P value for the difference in the r between C/D ratio with RNFL (-0.628) and DDLS with RNFL (-0.8369) was significant (P < 0.01) when correlation of C/D, DDLS with RNFL was considered.

CONCLUSION

The DDLS shows stronger correlation with structural changes in OCT than C/D ratio. The disc diameter and rim width increases the value of clinical optic disc examination.

Для цитирования: Chandra Anuradha, Bandyopadhyay Arun Kumar, Bhaduri Gautam. A comparative study of two methods of optic disc evaluation in patients of glaucoma.. Oman journal of ophthalmology. 2013. DOI: 10.4103/0974-620x.116643.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.