MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.23938/assn.0166

Медицинская библиотека · Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2009

[Clinical and radiological diagnosis of neurocysticercosis: a case report].

Navarro González D, Huarte I, Santesteban R, Bidarte M, Ayechu A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Neurocysticercosis is the most frequent parasitic disease of the central nervous system and the first cause of acquired epilepsy in endemic areas. Our aim in is to use clinical and radiological criteria to orientate diagnosis where there is suspicion of neurocysticercosis, presenting a clinical case as an example.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We present the case of a 43 year old woman of Bolivian origin, who came to accidents and emergencies after suffering a generalized convulsive crisis, witnessed by relatives of the patient.

RESULTS

A cranial computerized axial tomography was taken, which together with her clinical history led to suspicion of neurocysticercosis. She was admitted to the neurosurgery department for completion of the study, which confirmed the diagnosis of suspicion. She received treatment with albendazol and corticoids, with a good evolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurocysticercosis is an emergent pathology in developed countries, due to the increase of immigration from endemic areas, mainly from Latin America. Epilepsy is the most frequent clinical expression, but presentation can vary greatly. A high degree of suspicion is necessary in order to be able to diagnose this disease.

Для цитирования: Navarro González D, Huarte I, Santesteban R, Bidarte M, Ayechu A. [Clinical and radiological diagnosis of neurocysticercosis: a case report].. Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra. 2009. DOI: 10.23938/assn.0166.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.