MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12038-008-0075-y

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of biosciences · 2008

Human cysticercosis and Indian scenario: a review.

Prasad Kashi Nath, Prasad Amit, Verma Avantika, Singh Aloukick Kumar

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Cysticercosis, caused by Taenia solium larva is a major public health problem,especially in the developing world and neurocysticercosis (NCC) is considered to be the most common parasitic infestation of the central nervous system. NCC is identified as the single most common cause of community acquired active epilepsy; 26.3% to 53.8% active epilepsy cases in the developing world including India and Latin America are due to NCC.It is also becoming more common in the developed world because of increased migration of people with the disease or Taenia solium carriers and frequent travel to the endemic countries. It is estimated that three quarters of the estimated 50 million people with active epilepsy live in the poor countries of the world. Recent Indian studies using neuroimaging techniques suggest that the disease burden in India surpasses many other developing countries. Hence it is important to know the epidemiology,pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria so as to assess the disease burden and adopt interventional strategies for its control.Literature search was done for this review with special emphasis on Indian studies to create awareness about the disease in India,since cysticercosis is preventable and potentially eradicable.

Для цитирования: Prasad Kashi Nath, Prasad Amit, Verma Avantika, Singh Aloukick Kumar. Human cysticercosis and Indian scenario: a review.. Journal of biosciences. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s12038-008-0075-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.