MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2026

Long-term durability of self-expandable transcatheter heart valves in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: a matched-cohort analysis.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Massussi Mauro, Cristiano Nicola, Chizzola Giuliano, Fiorina Claudia, Costa Giulia, Angelillis Marco, Bellini Barbara, Bruschi Giuseppe, Merlanti Bruno, Gorla Riccardo, Barletta Marta, Fineschi Massimo, Chin Diana, Pancaldi Edoardo, Pezzola Elisa, Archetti Paolo, Branca Luca, Regazzoli Damiano, Montorfano Matteo, De Carlo Marco, Adamo Marianna

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) presents unique challenges for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and evidence on long-term bioprosthetic durability in an BAV compared to a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) remains limited. We aimed to compare the 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance of self-expandable TAVI in patients with BAV versus TAV stenosis, using propensity score-matched data from a large, real-world, multicentre registry.

METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre analysis included patients treated with self-expandable TAVI (2009-2020) from the Medtronic One Hospital ClinicalService registry. Patients with at least one echocardiographic follow-up were matched 1 : 1 (n = 106 BAV; n = 106 TAV) based on key clinical and procedural characteristics. Primary endpoints were structural valve deterioration (SVD) and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF), defined by VARC-3 criteria, analysed as cumulative incidence functions accounting for competing risk of death. All-cause mortality was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS: At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of SVD was 1.07% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-5.26] in BAV and 1.79% (95% CI: 0.14-8.50) in TAV (P = 0.829). BVF occurred in 2.38% (95% CI: 0.44-7.62) of BAV and 2.8% (95% CI: 0.47-9.19) of TAV patients (P = 0.782). Hemodynamic performance remained stable over time, with no statistically significant differences between the mean gradients at 5 years (7.8 ± 2.8 mmHg BAV versus 9.5 ± 11.7 mmHg TAV, P = 0.304). All-cause mortality at 5 years was 41.7% (BAV) versus 51.5% (TAV, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION: In this propensity-matched, real-world multicentre cohort, BAV and TAV patients treated with self-expandable TAVI showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year durability and hemodynamic performance. These findings are hypothesis-generating and suggest TAVI may be a reasonable option for selected BAV patients, pending further validation from randomized controlled trials.

Предметные рубрики MeSH