Should Super-Selective Intra-Arterial Chemoradiotherapy Be Prioritized over Surgical Resection for Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer?

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES

Super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (SSIACRT) is an alternatively effective treatment for locally advanced oral cavity cancer although no comparative studies on prognosis between SSIACRT and surgical resection with or without post-operative radiotherapy (S+R) have been reported. This study aimed to compare the 5-year survival rate and Quality of Life (QoL) between S+R and SSIACRT for locally advanced oral cavity cancer.

METHODS

From a total of 326 patients with stage III and IV oral cavity cancer treated between 2000-2020 at a single institution, 149 patients treated with S+R and SSIACRT were analyzed by using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method, a pseudo-randomized controlled trial, and the matched cases were retrospectively evaluated. The 5-year survival rate and QoL were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the University of Washington QoL questionnaire, respectively. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare 5-year survival rate and to assess factors affecting survival rates, respectively. Paired t-test was used to compare QoL.

RESULTS

To compare the 5-year survival rate and QoL between S+R and SSIACRT, 48 and 15 cases were matched after PSM. The 149 cases were further evaluated for covariates affecting survival rates. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate and 5-year crude survival rate were 52.4% and 44.3% for S+R and 71.3%, and 62.9% for SSIACRT, respectively. There was no statistical difference in survival rates between both treatments, based on Log-rank test analysis. Treatment method was the only independent variable that influenced survival rates. SSIACRT showed better statistical difference in QoL evaluation, specifically in appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, speech, shoulder, taste, mood, and total score.

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated survival outcomes that were comparable to, and not inferior to, S+R. However, SSIACRT was associated with superior quality-of-life outcomes compared with S+R, as shown by Cox proportional hazards modeling. These findings suggest that SSIACRT is an effective treatment option and, from a quality-of-life perspective, may be considered a preferable approach in the management of locally advanced oral cavity cancer.