MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/cvr/cvz289

Медицинская библиотека · Cardiovascular research · 2020

Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR.

Li Jianping, Gong Yanjun, Wang Weimin, Yang Qing, Liu Bin, Lu Yuan, Xu Yawei, Huo Yunlong, Yi Tieci, Liu Jian, Li Yongle, Xu Shaopeng, Zhao Lei, Ali Ziad A, Huo Yong

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: Conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured invasively using a coronary guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor. A non-invasive derived FFR would eliminate risk of coronary injury, minimize technical limitations, and potentially increase adoption. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a computational pressure-flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR), applied to coronary angiography, compared to invasive FFR.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

The FLASH FFR study was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study conducted at six centres in China. Eligible patients had native coronary artery target lesions with visually estimated diameter stenosis of 30-90% and diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris. Using computational pressure-fluid dynamics, in conjunction with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, applied to coronary angiography, caFFR was measured online in real-time and compared blind to conventional invasive FFR by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was the agreement between caFFR and FFR, with a pre-specified performance goal of 84%. Between June and December 2018, matched caFFR and FFR measurements were performed in 328 coronary arteries. Total operational time for caFFR was 4.54 ± 1.48 min. caFFR was highly correlated to FFR (R = 0.89, P = 0.76) with a mean bias of -0.002 ± 0.049 (95% limits of agreement -0.098 to 0.093). The diagnostic performance of caFFR vs. FFR was diagnostic accuracy 95.7%, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 97.2%, negative predictive value 95.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.979.

CONCLUSIONS

Using wire-based FFR as the reference, caFFR has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. caFFR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, technical error and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1800019522.

Для цитирования: Li Jianping, Gong Yanjun, Wang Weimin, Yang Qing, Liu Bin, Lu Yuan, Xu Yawei, Huo Yunlong, Yi Tieci, Liu Jian, Li Yongle, Xu Shaopeng, Zhao Lei, Ali Ziad A, Huo Yong. Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR.. Cardiovascular research. 2020. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz289.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.