MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.21.39483

Медицинская библиотека · The Pan African medical journal · 2023

Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods using stool, blood, and nasopharyngeal swab samples.

Oloo Marceline Adhiambo, Awandu Shehu Shagari, Onyango Benson, Magwanga Richard Odongo, Oluoch Alfred Ochieng, Lidechi Shirley, Muok Erick Mbata, Munga Stephen, Estambale Benson

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

as a public health policy, the ongoing global coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination drives require continuous tracking, tracing, and testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Diagnostic testing is important in virus detection and understanding its spread for timely intervention. This is especially important for low-income settings where the majority of the population remains untested. This is well supported by the fact that of about 9% of the Kenyan population had been tested for the virus.

METHODS

this was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Kisumu and Siaya Referral Hospitals in Kenya. Here we report on the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen detection test (Ag-RDT) of SARS-CoV-2 compared with the quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using stool and nasopharyngeal swab samples. Further, the mean Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in western Kenya were evaluated.

RESULTS

the sensitivity and specificity of Ag-RDT were 76.3% (95% CI, 59.8-88.6%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 87.3-99.5%) with a negative and positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI, 73.8%-93.0%) and 93% (95% CI, 78.6%-99.2%) respectively. There was substantial agreement of 88% (Kappa value of 0.75, 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) between Ag-RDT and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR, and between stool and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR results (83.7% agreement, Kapa value 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). The mean IgM and IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 were not different in asymptomatic individuals, 1.11 (95% CI, 0.78-1.44) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.11) compared to symptomatic individuals 4.30 (95% CI 3.30-5.31) and 4.16 (95% CI 3.32 -5.00).

CONCLUSION

the choice of an appropriate SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic, screening, and surveillance test should be guided by the specific study needs and a rational approach for optimal results.

Для цитирования: Oloo Marceline Adhiambo, Awandu Shehu Shagari, Onyango Benson, Magwanga Richard Odongo, Oluoch Alfred Ochieng, Lidechi Shirley, Muok Erick Mbata, Munga Stephen, Estambale Benson. Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods using stool, blood, and nasopharyngeal swab samples.. The Pan African medical journal. 2023. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.21.39483.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.