Canyoning Incidents and Accidents: Causes and Injury Patterns.
Аннотация
ObjectiveThe aim of this convenience sampling study was to analyze incidents and accidents occurring in the context of canyoning so as to understand their causes, resulting injuries, and severity.MethodsThe sample consisted of 179 individuals (104 males, 75 females, age 35±9 y) who experienced an incident or accident while practicing canyoning and voluntarily participated in this convenience sampling study. The methods employed included the collection of information regarding incidents and accidents reported by canyoning practitioners. The most frequently associated activities for these events were identified as well as the body parts most affected by injuries. Additionally, an examination of the causes that posed a higher risk of accidents and injuries was conducted.ResultsOur results revealed that 21% of participants were beginners, among whom 23% were involved in accidents and 16% in incidents. In contrast, 79% of participants were experienced, with 84% involved in incidents and 78% in accidents. Additionally, 32% of accidents occurred during jumping progression, and 28% occurred while walking. Rope progression was the third most frequently associated activity with accidents, accounting for 24% of cases. Regarding incidents, rope progression was the most common activity, representing 49%, followed by water progression at 22%. Lower limb injuries were the most prevalent, particularly 25% affecting the tibia/fibula and 24% the ankles.ConclusionsThe main causes of accidents were jumping and walking progression, with rope progression being the most common in incidents. Lower limb injuries, especially to the tibia, fibula, and ankle, were most frequent. There is a need to increase awareness among canyoning practitioners about the risks of these activities.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.