Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Silver-Impregnated Fibrous Hydrocolloid Dressings With Silver Sulfadiazine Cream Dressings for the Treatment of Fracture Blisters to Determine Time to Surgical Readiness.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wiese Karin R, van Heukelum Marcus, Lombard Carl J, Ferreira Nando, Burger Marilize C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate, in patients with fracture blisters, the time to surgical readiness in those treated with silver-impregnated fibrous hydrocolloid (SFH) dressings compared with those treated with topical silver sulfadiazine (SS) cream and to determine the direct costs associated with both treatments.
DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: The study was conducted at Tygerberg Hospital, a tertiary care facility, and Worcester Provincial Hospital, a secondary care facility, Western Cape, South Africa.
PATIENTS: Patients >18 years of age with one or more fracture blisters overlying fractures requiring surgical fixation were considered for inclusion.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was the time to surgical readiness, after complete re-epithelialization of the affected site, in both groups. The direct cost associated with each treatment and the daily cost associated with hospital stay per day were recorded.
RESULTS: At an interim analysis, 70 patients had been enrolled and completed the study protocol with 35 patients per group. Groups were balanced across patient and clinical demographic characteristics. A significant difference of 4 days (95% confidence interval: 2.9-5.1 days, P < 0.001) in the mean time to surgical readiness (SFH group, 5.3 days vs. SS group, 9.3 days) was observed. No difference between the time to surgical procedure as well as the total length of hospital stay between the 2 groups was observed.
CONCLUSION: This study reports that SFH dressings are a cost-effective treatment option for the management of fracture blisters evidenced by a significant accelerated time to blister re-epithelialization compared with a commonly described method of SS cream dressings.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level 1. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: The study was conducted at Tygerberg Hospital, a tertiary care facility, and Worcester Provincial Hospital, a secondary care facility, Western Cape, South Africa.
PATIENTS: Patients >18 years of age with one or more fracture blisters overlying fractures requiring surgical fixation were considered for inclusion.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was the time to surgical readiness, after complete re-epithelialization of the affected site, in both groups. The direct cost associated with each treatment and the daily cost associated with hospital stay per day were recorded.
RESULTS: At an interim analysis, 70 patients had been enrolled and completed the study protocol with 35 patients per group. Groups were balanced across patient and clinical demographic characteristics. A significant difference of 4 days (95% confidence interval: 2.9-5.1 days, P < 0.001) in the mean time to surgical readiness (SFH group, 5.3 days vs. SS group, 9.3 days) was observed. No difference between the time to surgical procedure as well as the total length of hospital stay between the 2 groups was observed.
CONCLUSION: This study reports that SFH dressings are a cost-effective treatment option for the management of fracture blisters evidenced by a significant accelerated time to blister re-epithelialization compared with a commonly described method of SS cream dressings.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level 1. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.