DOI 10.1007/s00106-022-01182-w
[Surgery for parotid gland cancer-controversial and proven aspects].
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Due to the rarity of primary parotid malignancies, there are currently only limited clinical study data on the optimal surgical therapy. Parotid malignancies encompass a broad spectrum of more than 20 different histological subtypes with varying biology, which thus represents a challenge for even experienced pathologists and head and neck surgeons with proven expertise in salivary gland surgery.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this review article is to provide an overview of the current literature on surgical therapy of the primary tumor and the cN0 neck as well as treatment of the facial nerve, and to shed light on the various controversial aspects of this topic.
RESULTS
In salivary gland oncology there is a trend towards safe (R0) but more conservative surgery. Currently, less-invasive surgical approaches could potentially be applied in a small subgroup with carefully selected caudally located and R0-resected "low-grade tumors" in stages T1-T2 and cN0 in relatively young patients with high compliance and more in the context of structured clinical studies. Elective neck dissection in the case of cN0 status should be carried out if risk factors for occult cervical lymph node metastasis (T3-T4a, "high-grade subtypes," advanced age, lymphangitic carcinomatosis) are present. In cases of small "low-grade parotid carcinomas," narrow resection margins or even microscopic tumor residues on the facial nerve can potentially be adequately compensated with adjuvant radiation therapy. However, due to the lack of solid data, the significance of the actual effect of the radiation in this situation should be viewed with great caution.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.