Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026
Piezoelectric Palatine Foraminotomy in Wide Cleft Palate Repair: A New Approach for Safe Neurovascular Pedicle Mobilization.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kokaçya Ömer, Tabakan İbrahim, Arslan Abdullah, Yaprak Gazi Kutalmış, Kuru Ali
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of large cleft palates is challenging and is associated with high postoperative fistula rates. Midline tension is a critical factor in fistula formation. Foraminotomy enables increased medial mobilization of the palatal flaps, particularly in cases in which standard palatal closure would otherwise result in excessive midline tension; however, this procedure carries a risk of neurovascular pedicle injury and subsequent flap necrosis. In this study, we present our surgical technique for piezoelectric palatine foraminotomy to facilitate palatal flap mobilization and tension-free closure in large cleft palate repair.
METHODS: Seventeen patients with wide cleft palates (≥15 mm cleft width; Veau class II-IV) who underwent primary palatoplasty with piezoelectric foraminotomy between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed. All procedures were performed by a single senior surgeon. The piezoelectric device equipped with a sinus lift tip was used to enlarge the palatine canal via controlled removal of the posteromedial bony wall, allowing tension-free medial mobilization of the neurovascular pedicle. Postoperative outcomes including fistula formation, flap necrosis, and neurovascular complications were assessed over a minimum 12-month follow-up period.
RESULTS: No intraoperative or postoperative neurovascular pedicle injury, flap necrosis, or wound infection was observed. Oronasal fistula developed in 3 patients (17.6%), all with Veau class III or IV clefts, located at the hard palate-soft palate junction.
CONCLUSIONS: Piezoelectric osteotomy for palatine foraminotomy is a feasible, controlled, and soft tissue-preserving technique that may enhance the safety of neurovascular pedicle mobilization in wide cleft palate repair.
METHODS: Seventeen patients with wide cleft palates (≥15 mm cleft width; Veau class II-IV) who underwent primary palatoplasty with piezoelectric foraminotomy between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed. All procedures were performed by a single senior surgeon. The piezoelectric device equipped with a sinus lift tip was used to enlarge the palatine canal via controlled removal of the posteromedial bony wall, allowing tension-free medial mobilization of the neurovascular pedicle. Postoperative outcomes including fistula formation, flap necrosis, and neurovascular complications were assessed over a minimum 12-month follow-up period.
RESULTS: No intraoperative or postoperative neurovascular pedicle injury, flap necrosis, or wound infection was observed. Oronasal fistula developed in 3 patients (17.6%), all with Veau class III or IV clefts, located at the hard palate-soft palate junction.
CONCLUSIONS: Piezoelectric osteotomy for palatine foraminotomy is a feasible, controlled, and soft tissue-preserving technique that may enhance the safety of neurovascular pedicle mobilization in wide cleft palate repair.