MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2013

[A case of metachronous gastrointestinal perforation of a patient with metastatic rectal cancer during treatment with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy].

Sadatomo Ai, Koinuma Koji, Miki Atsushi, Horie Hisanaga, Yasuda Yoshikazu

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 64-year-old man received mFOLFOX6+bevacizumab chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer after rectal cancer resection( Stage IV). After 28 courses, he had an abdominal pain with fever, and computed tomography showed pelvic abscess with stercolith of appendix. He was diagnosed as acute appendicitis with intra-abdominal abscess, and emergency appendectomy with drainage was performed. Two days after the operation, he was suspected to have a sutural leakage as was suggested from the properties of his drainage, therefore re-operation was performed. A small hole of the ileum, about 2mm in diameter, was observed. The margin of the hole showed neither inflammatory nor neoplastic change, and a suturing closure of the hole was performed. The post-operative course was uneventful. Histopathological findings of the resected appendix suggested that the perforation was caused by necrosis of metastatic cancer cells penetrating the appendiceal wall. This is a case of a bevacizumab-related metachronous perforation that occurred in different gastrointestinal origins within a very short term.

Для цитирования: Sadatomo Ai, Koinuma Koji, Miki Atsushi, Horie Hisanaga, Yasuda Yoshikazu. [A case of metachronous gastrointestinal perforation of a patient with metastatic rectal cancer during treatment with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy].. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy. 2013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.