DOI 10.1080/09546634.2020.1729950
Assessing adherence to evidence-based guidelines of care for acne vulgaris.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Care guidelines are developed to assist in performing high-quality, cost-effective care.
OBJECTIVE
This study was designed to assess the adherence to evidence-based guidelines of care for acne.
METHODS
For acne treatment, we analyzed 2008-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey visits. For each medication mention, a grade was assigned based upon the American Academy of Dermatology 2007 treatment guidelines.
RESULTS
Most encounters achieved the grade of A, regardless of specialty or patient population. A proportion of visits involved the use of oral antibiotics monotherapy, which occurred at 11.7% (8.6-14.8) dermatologist and 25.6% (12.4-38.8) of non-dermatologist visits. Although not addressed in the 2007 guidelines, this practice was not recommended in the updated 2016 guidelines.
LIMITATIONS: Other factors influencing prescribing behaviors cannot be completely assessed using extant data.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that nearly all physicians adhered to the 2007 guidelines. Many prescribed antibiotic monotherapy a practice not supported by the evidence.Capsule summaryAlthough acne practice guidelines are published, adherence to these guidelines is unknown.Using a grading system analogous to the United States A to F system, virtually all providers receive a grade of A. We expect that the grade will be lower in the future.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.