Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2016
Assessment of Predictive Response Factors to Intragastric Balloon Therapy for the Treatment of Obesity.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Madeira Eduardo, Madeira Miguel, Guedes Erika Paniago, Mafort Thiago Thomaz, Neto Leonardo Vieira, de Oliveira Moreira Rodrigo, de Pinho Paulo Roberto Alves, Lopes Agnaldo José, Farias Maria Lucia Fleiuss
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a worldwide epidemic that is difficult to control with non-invasive treatments, which usually present poor results. In this context, the intragastric balloon (IGB) is an important tool that presents a mean body weight loss (BWL) estimated at approximately 12%, although individual responses are highly variable.
OBJECTIVES: This study assesses whether there are factors that can predict responses to IGB therapy either before or early after placement of the device.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 obese patients underwent insertion of IGB placed endoscopically, and patients were monitored for 6 months. The evaluated predictive factors involved general characteristics and psychological, social, and dyspeptic aspects, and the preliminary results obtained in the first month after balloon placement.
RESULTS: The mean weight loss was 11.5%, and 48% of the participants presented BWL >10%. Among the factors analyzed before IGB placement, only advanced age (P = .04) and higher scores obtained in the social relationships domain of a shorter version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life questionnaire (P = .02) were significant. Analysis of the factors evaluated after IGB placement revealed that the BWL amounts observed in week 2 (P = .001) and week 4 (P < .001) and the intensity of dyspeptic symptoms in week 2 (P < .001) were positive predictive factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of predictive factors may help to manage patients with IGB.
OBJECTIVES: This study assesses whether there are factors that can predict responses to IGB therapy either before or early after placement of the device.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 obese patients underwent insertion of IGB placed endoscopically, and patients were monitored for 6 months. The evaluated predictive factors involved general characteristics and psychological, social, and dyspeptic aspects, and the preliminary results obtained in the first month after balloon placement.
RESULTS: The mean weight loss was 11.5%, and 48% of the participants presented BWL >10%. Among the factors analyzed before IGB placement, only advanced age (P = .04) and higher scores obtained in the social relationships domain of a shorter version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life questionnaire (P = .02) were significant. Analysis of the factors evaluated after IGB placement revealed that the BWL amounts observed in week 2 (P = .001) and week 4 (P < .001) and the intensity of dyspeptic symptoms in week 2 (P < .001) were positive predictive factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of predictive factors may help to manage patients with IGB.