Cancer cell international · 2022
Prognostic biomarkers of malignant patients with pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peng Peng, Yang Yuan, Du Juan, Zhai Kan, Shi Huan-Zhong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion is a common clinical problem in patients with cancer. We aimed to summarize all the known prognostic indicators of malignant pleural effusion.
METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis with a systematic literature search. All prospective or retrospective cohort studies that estimated the prognostic factors of malignant pleural effusion were enrolled. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Eventually, we identified 82 studies with a total of 10,748 patients that met our inclusion criteria. The LENT score showed a good prognostic value (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.67-2.31) so did the LENT score item. In addition, clinical parameters like stage (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.25-2.25), distant metastasis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89), EGFR mutation (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.74), serum biological parameters like hemoglobin (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17-2.06), albumin (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.25-2.34), C-reaction protein (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.49-2.29), VEGF (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18-2.43) and pleural effusion biological parameters like PH (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46-2.60), glucose (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.18-2.61), VEGF (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.67-2.37), and survivin (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.17-7.20) are also prognostic factors for malignant pleural effusion.
CONCLUSIONS: For malignant pleural effusion, LENT score and its items are valuable prognostic biomarkers, so do the clinical parameters like stage, distant metastasis, EGFR mutation, the serum biological parameters like hemoglobin, albumin, C-reaction protein, VEGF and the pleural effusion biological parameters like PH, glucose, VEGF and survivin.
METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis with a systematic literature search. All prospective or retrospective cohort studies that estimated the prognostic factors of malignant pleural effusion were enrolled. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Eventually, we identified 82 studies with a total of 10,748 patients that met our inclusion criteria. The LENT score showed a good prognostic value (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.67-2.31) so did the LENT score item. In addition, clinical parameters like stage (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.25-2.25), distant metastasis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89), EGFR mutation (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.74), serum biological parameters like hemoglobin (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17-2.06), albumin (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.25-2.34), C-reaction protein (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.49-2.29), VEGF (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18-2.43) and pleural effusion biological parameters like PH (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46-2.60), glucose (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.18-2.61), VEGF (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.67-2.37), and survivin (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.17-7.20) are also prognostic factors for malignant pleural effusion.
CONCLUSIONS: For malignant pleural effusion, LENT score and its items are valuable prognostic biomarkers, so do the clinical parameters like stage, distant metastasis, EGFR mutation, the serum biological parameters like hemoglobin, albumin, C-reaction protein, VEGF and the pleural effusion biological parameters like PH, glucose, VEGF and survivin.