Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2023
Histogram analysis of ultrasonographic images in the differentiation of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xia Feifei, Zha Xiaoyu, Qin Wenjuan, Wu Hui, Li Zeying, Li Changxue
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic value of histogram analysis (HA) using ultrasonographic (US) images for differentiation among pleomorphic adenoma (PA), adenolymphoma (AL), and malignant tumors (MT) of the parotid gland.
STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative US images of 48 patients with PA, 39 patients with AL, and 17 patients with MT were retrospectively analyzed for gray-scale histograms. Nine first-order texture features derived from histograms of the tumors were compared. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of texture features. The Youden index maximum exponent was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were discovered in Mean and Skewness HA values between PA and AL (P<0.001), and in Mean values between AL and MT (P<0.001). However, comparison of PA and MT showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.01). Excellent discrimination was detected between PA and AL (AUC=0.802), and between AL and MT (AUC=0.822). The combination of Mean plus Skewness improved discrimination between PA and AL (AUC=0.823) with sensitivity values reaching 1.00. However, Mean plus Skewness applied to differentiate PA from AL and Mean values applied to distinguish AL and MT resulted in low specificity, indicating many false positive interpretations.
CONCLUSIONS: Histogram analysis is useful for differentiating PA from AL and AL from MT but not PA from MT.
STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative US images of 48 patients with PA, 39 patients with AL, and 17 patients with MT were retrospectively analyzed for gray-scale histograms. Nine first-order texture features derived from histograms of the tumors were compared. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of texture features. The Youden index maximum exponent was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were discovered in Mean and Skewness HA values between PA and AL (P<0.001), and in Mean values between AL and MT (P<0.001). However, comparison of PA and MT showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.01). Excellent discrimination was detected between PA and AL (AUC=0.802), and between AL and MT (AUC=0.822). The combination of Mean plus Skewness improved discrimination between PA and AL (AUC=0.823) with sensitivity values reaching 1.00. However, Mean plus Skewness applied to differentiate PA from AL and Mean values applied to distinguish AL and MT resulted in low specificity, indicating many false positive interpretations.
CONCLUSIONS: Histogram analysis is useful for differentiating PA from AL and AL from MT but not PA from MT.