MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0209825

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2019

Suprapubic bladder drainage and epidural catheters following abdominal surgery-A risk for urinary tract infections?

Wagner Johanna, Eiken Barbara, Haubitz Imme, Lichthardt Sven, Matthes Niels, Löb Stefan, Klein Ingo, Germer Christoph-Thomas, Wiegering Armin

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Epidural catheters are state of the art for postoperative analgesic in abdominal surgery. Due to neurolysis it can lead to postoperative urinary tract retention (POUR), which leads to prolonged bladder catheterization, which has an increased risk for urinary tract infections (UTI). Our aim was to identify the current perioperative management of urinary catheters and, second, to identify the optimal time of suprapubic bladder catheter removal in regard to the removal of the epidural catheter.

METHODS

We sent a questionnaire to 102 German hospitals and analyzed the 83 received answers to evaluate the current handling of bladder drainage and epidural catheters. Then, we conducted a retrospective study including 501 patients, who received an epidural and suprapubic catheter after abdominal surgery at the University Hospital Würzburg. We divided the patients into three groups according to the point in time of suprapubic bladder drainage removal in regard to the removal of the epidural catheter and analyzed the onset of a UTI.

RESULTS

Our survey showed that in almost all hospitals (98.8%), patients received an epidural catheter and a bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. The point in time of urinary catheter removal was equally distributed between before, simultaneously and after the removal of the epidural catheter (respectively: ~28-29%). The retrospective study showed a catheter-associated UTI in 6.7%. Women were affected significantly more often than men (10,7% versus 2,5%, p<0.001). There was a non-significant trend to more UTIs when the suprapubic catheter was removed after the epidural catheter (before: 5.7%, after: 8.4%).

CONCLUSION

The point in time of suprapubic bladder drainage removal in relation to the removal of the epidural catheter does not seem to correlate with the rate of UTIs. The current handling in Germany is inhomogeneous, so further studies to standardize treatment are recommended.

Для цитирования: Wagner Johanna, Eiken Barbara, Haubitz Imme, Lichthardt Sven, Matthes Niels, Löb Stefan, Klein Ingo, Germer Christoph-Thomas, Wiegering Armin. Suprapubic bladder drainage and epidural catheters following abdominal surgery-A risk for urinary tract infections?. PloS one. 2019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209825.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.