Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi · 2015
[One Case of Multiple Myeloma with Central Never System Infiltration].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Xiao-Jun, Wang Fu-Xu, Yang Lin, Wang Ying, Wen Shu-Peng, Luo Jian-Min, Zhou Zi-Wei, ZhANG Xue-Jun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyses and summarize a case of multiple myeloma with disseminated infiltration in central nervous system.
METHODS: The results of laboratorial examination and clinical data were analyzed and compared in the light of published literatures.
RESULTS: The headache and diplopia were caused by infiltration of multiple myeloma cells to the central nervous system. Unlike those reported in the literatures, this case was a rare case of disseminated infiltration inside the brain, and plasma cells were CD56+, this patient has not yet accepted any multiple myeloma-associated treatment as like that reported in the literatures. And different from cases reported, this patient showed a good response to the intrathecal chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Whether this good response is due to a heterogeneity of MM or effect of treatment-associated drug is still to be decided.
METHODS: The results of laboratorial examination and clinical data were analyzed and compared in the light of published literatures.
RESULTS: The headache and diplopia were caused by infiltration of multiple myeloma cells to the central nervous system. Unlike those reported in the literatures, this case was a rare case of disseminated infiltration inside the brain, and plasma cells were CD56+, this patient has not yet accepted any multiple myeloma-associated treatment as like that reported in the literatures. And different from cases reported, this patient showed a good response to the intrathecal chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Whether this good response is due to a heterogeneity of MM or effect of treatment-associated drug is still to be decided.