International journal of STD & AIDS · 2025
Thinking beyond the tablet: Acceptability of different HIV-PrEP modalities among GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in the UK.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ogaz Dana, Ratna Natasha, Vijayan Hridhya, Migchelsen Stephanie J, Reid David, Mullen Dolores, Phillips Dawn, Bell Eleanor, Djuretic Tamara, Nutland Will, Mercer Catherine H, Folkard Kate, Saunders John, Mohammed Hamish
Аннотация
BackgroundHIV-PrEP is a key component of HIV combination prevention and has been routinely available through oral formulations (i.e. oral tablets) across sexual health services (SHSs) in the UK since 2020. We used data from a large, online community survey to assess the acceptability and preference of different HIV-PrEP modalities among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and gender-diverse individuals living in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected from the 'Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health' (RiiSH) survey, an online community survey of 1106 GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men (November/December 2023), we performed a secondary analysis examining HIV-PrEP modality acceptability and preference (e.g. oral, long acting injectable, gel, or patch) (%) by HIV-PrEP history (never, in lookback period of last 3-4 months since survey completion). Where ≥2 modalities were indicated, participants were asked to specify a single preferred modality. Single choice options were assumed to be the preferred HIV-PrEP modality.ResultsIrrespective of HIV-PrEP history, long acting injectables were highly acceptable (>70%) and the preferred modality (58% [222/386] by those never having used HIV-PrEP, 73% [75/103] in those without HIV-PrEP use in the lookback, 74% [314/424] in those with HIV-PrEP use in the lookback).ConclusionsWe found high acceptability of the use of injectables, with general preference over oral tablets. If injectable HIV-PrEP becomes available at SHSs in England, these modalities could have positive impacts on HIV-PrEP delivery, use, and access.