The journal of international advanced otology · 2019
Seborrheic Keratosis or Squamous Carcinoma? Clinical Examination versus Biopsy: The Importance of Criticism.
Клинический случайСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Stadio Arianna, Amadori Maurizio, Dipietro Laura, Colangeli Roberta, Falcioni Maurizio, Ricci Giampietro, Frezza Daniele
Аннотация
We compare the results of clinical observation and histopathology analysis for developing a differential diagnosis of seborrheic keratosis (SK) of the external auditory canal (EAC). A 46-year-old man with a history of a recurrent lesion in the EAC underwent clinical observation of the skin lesion's appearance, computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and several biopsies. Initially, a benign form of SK was diagnosed based on several biopsies performed over a 10-year period. The lesion's appearance was consistent with a malignant disease, which led the clinician to perform a CT scan and an MRI scan. The patient underwent partial petrosectomy to completely remove the lesion as CT and MRI scans showed an infiltrative process. Squamous carcinoma was the final histological diagnosis. The patient was disease free at 1 year of follow-up after petrosectomy. In conclusion, if there are inconsistencies between clinical observation and histological report, additional tests should be performed to exclude the malignity of a lesion.