Digestion · 2018
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated Using Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with a Ligation Device.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takita Maiko, Sakai Eiji, Nakao Tomomi, Kimoto Yoshiaki, Ishii Rindo, Konishi Takafumi, Ueno Sakaya, Kanda Keisuke, Negishi Ryoju, Muramoto Takashi, Hashimoto Hirotsugu, Morikawa Teppei, Matsuhashi Nobuyuki, Ohata Ken
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The therapeutic strategies for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have not been standardized. We examined the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) and the long-term outcomes after endoscopic treatment.
METHODS: A total of 181 patients with rectal NETs <10 mm who were treated between May 2002 and May 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. All the lesions had been resected using ESMR-L, and the follow-up strategies were determined according to the pathological examinations. The long-term outcomes after a 53-month follow-up period were also evaluated.
RESULTS: R0 resection was achieved in 180 cases (99.4%). Lymphovascular invasion was confirmed in 67 cases (37.0%), while a curative resection was achieved in 114 cases (63.0%). One perforation (0.6%) and 11 cases with delayed bleeding (6.1%) were observed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a tumor size > 5 mm (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.04-4.08, p = 0.04) was a significant independent predictor of the presence of lymphovascular invasion. Of the 67 patients with non-curative resections, 11 patients underwent additional surgery; lymph node metastasis was confirmed in 2 cases (18.2%). No local or distant metastases were observed during the follow-up period in 77 patients with a curative resection, 9 patients who received additional surgery, and 50 patients with non-curative resections.
CONCLUSION: ESMR-L is an easy, safe and effective treatment for rectal NETs <10 mm in diameter, and the prognosis of patients seems to be good, despite a relatively high rate of lymphovascular invasion.
METHODS: A total of 181 patients with rectal NETs <10 mm who were treated between May 2002 and May 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. All the lesions had been resected using ESMR-L, and the follow-up strategies were determined according to the pathological examinations. The long-term outcomes after a 53-month follow-up period were also evaluated.
RESULTS: R0 resection was achieved in 180 cases (99.4%). Lymphovascular invasion was confirmed in 67 cases (37.0%), while a curative resection was achieved in 114 cases (63.0%). One perforation (0.6%) and 11 cases with delayed bleeding (6.1%) were observed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a tumor size > 5 mm (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.04-4.08, p = 0.04) was a significant independent predictor of the presence of lymphovascular invasion. Of the 67 patients with non-curative resections, 11 patients underwent additional surgery; lymph node metastasis was confirmed in 2 cases (18.2%). No local or distant metastases were observed during the follow-up period in 77 patients with a curative resection, 9 patients who received additional surgery, and 50 patients with non-curative resections.
CONCLUSION: ESMR-L is an easy, safe and effective treatment for rectal NETs <10 mm in diameter, and the prognosis of patients seems to be good, despite a relatively high rate of lymphovascular invasion.