International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 1995
Follow-up of cognitive functioning in patients with small cell lung cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Oosterhout A G, Boon P J, Houx P J, ten Velde G P, Twijnstra A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Study of the course of possible treatment-related cognitive impairment in patients with small cell lung cancer.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with small cell lung cancer underwent successive neurologic and neuropsychologic examinations until 5 months after prophylactic cranial irradiation, and in their pretherapeutic condition were compared to matched controls. Patients with brain metastases were excluded from this study.
RESULTS: Neurologic examination revealed central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities only in the 14 patients with brain metastases. In the remaining patients, neuropsychologic tests showed clear differences between the pretherapeutic performance of patients and that of matched controls (p < 0.001), but no significant deterioration either during or after therapy (0.1 < p < 0.8).
CONCLUSION: The difference between the pretherapeutic performance of patients and that of matched controls may indicate disease-related cognitive impairment. Within the observation period, no adverse effects of the used therapy were found. Our observations underline the importance of a pretherapeutic assessment in neurotoxicity research.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with small cell lung cancer underwent successive neurologic and neuropsychologic examinations until 5 months after prophylactic cranial irradiation, and in their pretherapeutic condition were compared to matched controls. Patients with brain metastases were excluded from this study.
RESULTS: Neurologic examination revealed central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities only in the 14 patients with brain metastases. In the remaining patients, neuropsychologic tests showed clear differences between the pretherapeutic performance of patients and that of matched controls (p < 0.001), but no significant deterioration either during or after therapy (0.1 < p < 0.8).
CONCLUSION: The difference between the pretherapeutic performance of patients and that of matched controls may indicate disease-related cognitive impairment. Within the observation period, no adverse effects of the used therapy were found. Our observations underline the importance of a pretherapeutic assessment in neurotoxicity research.