MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.08.006

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of epidemiology · 2018

Challenges and common weaknesses in case-control studies on drug use and road traffic injury based on drug testing of biological samples.

Gjerde Hallvard, Romeo Giovanni, Mørland Jørg

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine and discuss common weaknesses and errors in case-control studies on the association between drug use and road traffic crash injury among drivers and recommend improvements for future studies.

METHODS

A search for case-control studies published between 2000 and 2016 was performed using PubMed and other databases in addition to manual search. The used methodologies were compared with requirements and recommendations for case-control studies as well as current knowledge on the interpretation of drug concentrations in biological samples.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified. The major difficulties in the studies were related to likely selection bias, information bias, and confounding. In some studies, the definition of drug exposure was different for controls than for cases, generating potentially serious errors in the odds ratio estimations. Other weaknesses include lacking explanation of the assessment of drug exposure, missing covariates, lacking description of statistical methods, and lack of discussion of bias and confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the observed challenges and weaknesses can be overcome or reduced. Recommendations for future studies are presented.

Для цитирования: Gjerde Hallvard, Romeo Giovanni, Mørland Jørg. Challenges and common weaknesses in case-control studies on drug use and road traffic injury based on drug testing of biological samples.. Annals of epidemiology. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.08.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.