International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2020
Laparoscopic VS. Open splenectomy and oesophagogastric devascularisation for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension: A retrospective cohort study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Zhi-Cheng, Jiang Wen-Zhu, Chen Lu, Tang Xiao-Dong, Liu Shuang-Hai
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We compared laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation vs. open splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation in patients with portal hypertension secondary to liver cirrhosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 192 patients diagnosed with portal hypertension and severe gastroesophageal varices at our hospital between January 2002 and December 2018; 62 patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation (laparoscopic group), and 130 patients underwent the open procedure (open group). The results and outcomes were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: The median blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (180 vs. 380 mL, P < 0.001). The length of hospitalisation was shorter (6 vs. 11 days, P < 0.001) and the complication rate was lower in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The general complication rates were 23.8% and 4.8% (P < 0.001), and the surgical complication rates were 56.1% and 24.2% (P < 0.001) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. During a postoperative follow-up period of 10-60 months, the incidence of oesophagogastric variceal rebleeding showed no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group showed a less volume of blood loss, shorter length of hospitalisation, and fewer postoperative complications but similar long-term outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 192 patients diagnosed with portal hypertension and severe gastroesophageal varices at our hospital between January 2002 and December 2018; 62 patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation (laparoscopic group), and 130 patients underwent the open procedure (open group). The results and outcomes were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: The median blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (180 vs. 380 mL, P < 0.001). The length of hospitalisation was shorter (6 vs. 11 days, P < 0.001) and the complication rate was lower in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The general complication rates were 23.8% and 4.8% (P < 0.001), and the surgical complication rates were 56.1% and 24.2% (P < 0.001) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. During a postoperative follow-up period of 10-60 months, the incidence of oesophagogastric variceal rebleeding showed no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group showed a less volume of blood loss, shorter length of hospitalisation, and fewer postoperative complications but similar long-term outcomes.