BMC gastroenterology · 2020
The role of a multidisciplinary team in the management of portal hypertension.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tseng Yujen, Ma Lili, Lv Minzhi, Luo Tiancheng, Liu Chengfeng, Wei Yichao, Liu Chu, Zhou Ji, Yan Zhiping, Xu Pengju, Hu Guohua, Ding Hong, Ji Yuan, Chen Shiyao, Wang Jian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is the most severe complication of portal hypertension, with a high mortality rate. The current recommendations for gastroesophageal varices include pharmacological treatment, endoscopic treatment, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement, and splenectomy with devascularization surgery. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) comprises of a group of medical experts and specialists across a range of disciplines, providing personalized and targeted patient care tailored to each individual's condition, circumstances, and expectations.
METHODS: Patients referred to the MDT clinic since its establishment in September 2014 were prospectively enrolled and followed-up for at least 12 months. Patient baseline characteristics, treatment methods, outcome and survival were compared to non-MDT patients retrieved from a prospectively maintained database with propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Propensity-score matching (PSM) was carried out to balance available covariates, resulting in 58 MDT patients vs. 111 non-MDT patients. Overall survival and variceal rebleed was compared between the two groups. The rate of variceal rebleed was significantly higher in the non-MDT group, while no difference in overall survival was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to investigate the role of a multidisciplinary team in the management of gastroesophageal varices secondary to portal hypertension. Patients treated based on MDT clinic recommendations had a significantly lower risk for variceal rebleed.
METHODS: Patients referred to the MDT clinic since its establishment in September 2014 were prospectively enrolled and followed-up for at least 12 months. Patient baseline characteristics, treatment methods, outcome and survival were compared to non-MDT patients retrieved from a prospectively maintained database with propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Propensity-score matching (PSM) was carried out to balance available covariates, resulting in 58 MDT patients vs. 111 non-MDT patients. Overall survival and variceal rebleed was compared between the two groups. The rate of variceal rebleed was significantly higher in the non-MDT group, while no difference in overall survival was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to investigate the role of a multidisciplinary team in the management of gastroesophageal varices secondary to portal hypertension. Patients treated based on MDT clinic recommendations had a significantly lower risk for variceal rebleed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesComputed Tomography AngiographyCyanoacrylatesEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleGastroenterologyGastroepiploic ArteryGastrointestinal HemorrhageGeneral SurgeryHumansHypertension, PortalInjections, IntralesionalLigationMaleMiddle AgedPathologyPatient Care TeamPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticPropensity ScoreRadiologyRadiology, InterventionalRecurrenceSclerosing SolutionsSclerotherapySplenectomy