Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2009
[Colonic perforation after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kurz W, Klein B, Rumstadt B
Аннотация
HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 40-year-old man had undergone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) due to left sided urinary lithiasis. 20 hours later he presented with left lower quadrant abdominal pain.
INVESTIGATIONS: Ultrasound examination revealed free intraabdominal air and free perisplenic fluid. An injury of the left kidney could be excluded.
TREATMENT AND COURSE: Due to increasing abdominal pain a laparoscopy was performed, revealing a faecal peritonitis. Since no perforation could be detected laroscopically, a laparotomy was performed, demonstrating a perforation of the descending colon. The perforation was oversewn, a defunctioning colostomy was not performed. Postoperatively the patient had an uncomplicated hospital stay and was discharged home on postoperative day 8.
CONCLUSION: ESWL is considered a safe method to treat urinary lithiasis with a low complication rate. Nevertheless serious potentially life-threatening pararenal complications can occur. Due to the increasing number of outpatient procedures, a careful clinical and ultrasound monitoring of the patient with early recognition and interdisciplinary management of complications is necessary after each ESWL therapy.
INVESTIGATIONS: Ultrasound examination revealed free intraabdominal air and free perisplenic fluid. An injury of the left kidney could be excluded.
TREATMENT AND COURSE: Due to increasing abdominal pain a laparoscopy was performed, revealing a faecal peritonitis. Since no perforation could be detected laroscopically, a laparotomy was performed, demonstrating a perforation of the descending colon. The perforation was oversewn, a defunctioning colostomy was not performed. Postoperatively the patient had an uncomplicated hospital stay and was discharged home on postoperative day 8.
CONCLUSION: ESWL is considered a safe method to treat urinary lithiasis with a low complication rate. Nevertheless serious potentially life-threatening pararenal complications can occur. Due to the increasing number of outpatient procedures, a careful clinical and ultrasound monitoring of the patient with early recognition and interdisciplinary management of complications is necessary after each ESWL therapy.