Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021
Impact of low luminance conditions on quality of life for the visually impaired: development of the Low Luminance Questionnaire Japanese version.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujita Kyoko, Suzukamo Yoshimi, Murotani Kenta, Jinno Akiko, Kamei Motohiro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ-J) and to evaluate its reliability and validity.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: LLQ-J was developed by standardized methods. A total of 101 patients comprising 55 with age-related macular degeneration, 25 with glaucoma, 15 with regressed proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and 6 with retinitis pigmentosa were included in this study. The patients completed the LLQ-J and Japanese version of the visual function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25). Using the LLQ-J data, floor and ceiling effects were computed. To examine internal consistency, some patients completed the LLQ-J a second time 2-4 weeks later and the data were analyzed for Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and low luminance visual acuity (LLVA) were measured, and low-luminance deficit (LLD) was calculated. Criterion validity was also tested.
RESULTS: No ceiling or floor effects were present in the LLQ-J data. Cronbach's alfa was 0.88, and ICCs were higher than 0.70 for all subscales. Moderate to high correlation was observed between LLQ-J and VFQ-25 (p < 0.01), confirming concurrent validity. "General dim lighting" and "Peripheral vision" were significantly associated with LLVA in the better eye (p < 0.05). "Mobility", "General dim lighting" and "Peripheral vision" were significantly associated with LLD (p < 0.05). "Emotional distress" was significantly associated with BCVA in the worse eye (p < 0.05). No subscales were associated with BCVA of the better eye.
CONCLUSIONS: The LLQ-J is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing QOL under low luminance conditions.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: LLQ-J was developed by standardized methods. A total of 101 patients comprising 55 with age-related macular degeneration, 25 with glaucoma, 15 with regressed proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and 6 with retinitis pigmentosa were included in this study. The patients completed the LLQ-J and Japanese version of the visual function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25). Using the LLQ-J data, floor and ceiling effects were computed. To examine internal consistency, some patients completed the LLQ-J a second time 2-4 weeks later and the data were analyzed for Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and low luminance visual acuity (LLVA) were measured, and low-luminance deficit (LLD) was calculated. Criterion validity was also tested.
RESULTS: No ceiling or floor effects were present in the LLQ-J data. Cronbach's alfa was 0.88, and ICCs were higher than 0.70 for all subscales. Moderate to high correlation was observed between LLQ-J and VFQ-25 (p < 0.01), confirming concurrent validity. "General dim lighting" and "Peripheral vision" were significantly associated with LLVA in the better eye (p < 0.05). "Mobility", "General dim lighting" and "Peripheral vision" were significantly associated with LLD (p < 0.05). "Emotional distress" was significantly associated with BCVA in the worse eye (p < 0.05). No subscales were associated with BCVA of the better eye.
CONCLUSIONS: The LLQ-J is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing QOL under low luminance conditions.