Journal of echocardiography · 2024
Diagnostic utility of velocity ratio for paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagai Shun, Toba Takayoshi, Izawa Yu, Honde Kei, Hirata Ken-Ichi, Tanaka Hidekazu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Calcification score by cardiac computed tomography (CT) is required for diagnosis of paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient (PLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS). According to the guideline, velocity ratio (VR) < 0.25 by echocardiography is defined as severe AS, but utility of VR in patients with PLFLG AS remains unknown. This retrospective study was therefore conducted to investigate the utility of VR for a diagnosis of severe AS based on CT in patients with PLFLG AS.
METHODS: We studied 58 patients with PLFLG AS. Severity of AS was defined as calcium score derived from cardiac CT.
RESULTS: Of the 58 patients, 28 (48.3%) were diagnosed with severe AS based on CT, while 23 of them (82.1%) had VR < 0.25. It was noteworthy that receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal VR cutoff value for a diagnosis of severe AS was 0.25, with an area under the curve of 0.870 (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of VR < 0.25 for a diagnosis of severe AS were 82.1%, 86.7%, 85.2% and 83.9%, respectively. Furthermore, patients who match the value of VR and severity of AS based on CT had higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher serum brain natriuretic peptide concentration, larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular stroke volume index.
CONCLUSION: The measurement of VR is simple, and VR < 0.25 can be used for diagnosis of patients with PLFLG AS as severe. Our findings may thus have clinical implications for routine clinical practice.
METHODS: We studied 58 patients with PLFLG AS. Severity of AS was defined as calcium score derived from cardiac CT.
RESULTS: Of the 58 patients, 28 (48.3%) were diagnosed with severe AS based on CT, while 23 of them (82.1%) had VR < 0.25. It was noteworthy that receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal VR cutoff value for a diagnosis of severe AS was 0.25, with an area under the curve of 0.870 (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of VR < 0.25 for a diagnosis of severe AS were 82.1%, 86.7%, 85.2% and 83.9%, respectively. Furthermore, patients who match the value of VR and severity of AS based on CT had higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher serum brain natriuretic peptide concentration, larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular stroke volume index.
CONCLUSION: The measurement of VR is simple, and VR < 0.25 can be used for diagnosis of patients with PLFLG AS as severe. Our findings may thus have clinical implications for routine clinical practice.