MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80797-2

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 1994

Laparoscopic evaluation and treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain.

Howard F M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of operative laparoscopic treatment at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

DESIGN

A retrospective study of women with CPP and at least 6 months of follow-up after laparoscopic evaluation and treatment.

SETTING

A faculty practice and community teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: A series of 65 consecutive women with greater than 1 month of pelvic pain who underwent laparoscopy. Thirty-two were referred by other physicians for evaluation of CPP.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients had operative laparoscopic treatment of all abnormal findings at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy. Nonspecific treatment such as presacral neurectomy or uterine nerve ablation was not performed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

After laparoscopic evaluation and treatment, 78% of patients had decreased pain and 45% were pain free. Prior unsuccessful medical or surgical treatment did not affect the response rate. Endometriosis and adhesive disease were the most common diagnoses, 38% and 34%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgical treatment of pathology noted at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy in women with CPP is appropriate, but less than one-half of patients may be expected to have complete pain relief.

Для цитирования: Howard F M. Laparoscopic evaluation and treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain.. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80797-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.