Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2021
Measuring breathing induced oesophageal motion and its dosimetric impact.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fechter Tobias, Adebahr Sonja, Grosu Anca-Ligia, Baltas Dimos
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy allows for a precise dose delivery. Organ motion bears the risk of undetected high dose healthy tissue exposure. An organ very susceptible to high dose is the oesophagus. Its low contrast on CT and the oblong shape render motion estimation difficult. We tackle this issue by modern algorithms to measure oesophageal motion voxel-wise and estimate motion related dosimetric impacts.
METHODS: Oesophageal motion was measured using deformable image registration and 4DCT of 11 internal and 5 public datasets. Current clinical practice of contouring the organ on 3DCT was compared to timely resolved 4DCT contours. Dosimetric impacts of the motion were estimated by analysing the trajectory of each voxel in the 4D dose distribution. Finally an organ motion model for patient-wise comparisons was built.
RESULTS: Motion analysis showed mean absolute maximal motion amplitudes of 4.55 ± 1.81 mm left-right, 5.29 ± 2.67 mm anterior-posterior and 10.78 ± 5.30 mm superior-inferior. Motion between cohorts differed significantly. In around 50% of the cases the dosimetric passing criteria was violated. Contours created on 3DCT did not cover 14% of the organ for 50% of the respiratory cycle and were around 38% smaller than the union of all 4D contours. The motion model revealed that the maximal motion is not limited to the lower part of the organ. Our results showed motion amplitudes higher than most reported values in the literature and that motion is very heterogeneous across patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual motion information should be considered in contouring and planning.
METHODS: Oesophageal motion was measured using deformable image registration and 4DCT of 11 internal and 5 public datasets. Current clinical practice of contouring the organ on 3DCT was compared to timely resolved 4DCT contours. Dosimetric impacts of the motion were estimated by analysing the trajectory of each voxel in the 4D dose distribution. Finally an organ motion model for patient-wise comparisons was built.
RESULTS: Motion analysis showed mean absolute maximal motion amplitudes of 4.55 ± 1.81 mm left-right, 5.29 ± 2.67 mm anterior-posterior and 10.78 ± 5.30 mm superior-inferior. Motion between cohorts differed significantly. In around 50% of the cases the dosimetric passing criteria was violated. Contours created on 3DCT did not cover 14% of the organ for 50% of the respiratory cycle and were around 38% smaller than the union of all 4D contours. The motion model revealed that the maximal motion is not limited to the lower part of the organ. Our results showed motion amplitudes higher than most reported values in the literature and that motion is very heterogeneous across patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual motion information should be considered in contouring and planning.