World journal of gastroenterology · 2006
Perioperative artificial nutrition in malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Guo-Hao, Liu Zhong-Hua, Wu Zhao-Han, Wu Zhao-Guang
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate the potential role of perioperative nutrition in reducing complications and mortality in malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients.
METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-eight elective moderately or severely malnourished surgical patients with gastric or colorectal cancers defined by the subjective global assessment (SGA) were randomly assigned to 7 d preoperative and 7 d postoperative parenteral or enteral nutrition vs a simple control group. The nutrition regimen included 24.6+/-5.2 kcal /kg per d non-protein and 0.23+/-0.04 g nitrogen /kg per d. Control patients did not receive preoperative nutrition but received 600+/-100 kcal non-protein plus or not plus 62+/-16 g crystalline amino acids postoperatively.
RESULTS: Complications occurred in 18.3% of the patients receiving nutrition and in 33.5% of the control patients (P=0.012). Fourteen patients died in the control group and 5 in those receiving nutrition. There were significant differences in the mortality between the two groups (2.1% vs 6.0%, P=0.003). The total length of hospitalization and postoperative stay of control patients were significantly longer (29 vs 22 d, P=0.014) than those of the studied patients (23 vs 12 d, P=0.000).
CONCLUSION: Perioperative nutrition support is beneficial for moderately or severely malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients and can reduce surgical complications and mortality.
METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-eight elective moderately or severely malnourished surgical patients with gastric or colorectal cancers defined by the subjective global assessment (SGA) were randomly assigned to 7 d preoperative and 7 d postoperative parenteral or enteral nutrition vs a simple control group. The nutrition regimen included 24.6+/-5.2 kcal /kg per d non-protein and 0.23+/-0.04 g nitrogen /kg per d. Control patients did not receive preoperative nutrition but received 600+/-100 kcal non-protein plus or not plus 62+/-16 g crystalline amino acids postoperatively.
RESULTS: Complications occurred in 18.3% of the patients receiving nutrition and in 33.5% of the control patients (P=0.012). Fourteen patients died in the control group and 5 in those receiving nutrition. There were significant differences in the mortality between the two groups (2.1% vs 6.0%, P=0.003). The total length of hospitalization and postoperative stay of control patients were significantly longer (29 vs 22 d, P=0.014) than those of the studied patients (23 vs 12 d, P=0.000).
CONCLUSION: Perioperative nutrition support is beneficial for moderately or severely malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients and can reduce surgical complications and mortality.