Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2002
Weight-based ordering: an evaluation of increased guideline use in hospital total parenteral nutrition dosing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dersch Deonne, Schoen Judy
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the past, parenteral nutrition in the Calgary Health Region was ordered as volumes of standard solutions, which limited individualization. Ordering total parenteral nutrition (TPN) that falls within macronutrient dosing guidelines may minimize complications associated with TPN, such as hyperglycemia, azotemia, hepatic steatosis, or continued malnutrition and catabolism. The Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary changed to a weight-based ordering system for TPN in 1999. This study's purpose was to determine if this change increased adherence to TPN dosing guidelines.
METHODS: Macronutrient doses in TPN solutions ordered as standard solutions were compared with those ordered by weight. Mean protein, dextrose, lipid, and kilocalorie doses and the number of orders deviating from guidelines were examined.
RESULTS: Weight-based dosing showed a significant reduction in deviation from guidelines for kilocalorie dose compared with TPN ordered as standard solutions. There also was a significant increase in mean protein dose and reductions in mean dextrose load and mean kilocalorie dose in the weight-based TPN group only, suggesting these changes were caused by the change in ordering method.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, weight-based ordering increased adherence to TPN dosing guidelines. The study did not have the statistical power to show significant differences between weight-based or standard TPN dosing; however, several trends were shown.
METHODS: Macronutrient doses in TPN solutions ordered as standard solutions were compared with those ordered by weight. Mean protein, dextrose, lipid, and kilocalorie doses and the number of orders deviating from guidelines were examined.
RESULTS: Weight-based dosing showed a significant reduction in deviation from guidelines for kilocalorie dose compared with TPN ordered as standard solutions. There also was a significant increase in mean protein dose and reductions in mean dextrose load and mean kilocalorie dose in the weight-based TPN group only, suggesting these changes were caused by the change in ordering method.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, weight-based ordering increased adherence to TPN dosing guidelines. The study did not have the statistical power to show significant differences between weight-based or standard TPN dosing; however, several trends were shown.