"One line": A method for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Neurological findings are important for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features (MSA-P), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). There is currently no fast and reliable method to distinguish these patients.
OBJECTIVES
To address this, we propose a novel approach to measure midbrain and pons size using a longitudinal "one line" method from the mid-sagittal view.
METHODS
Structural images were acquired from 101 subjects who underwent 3.0 T MRI (20 controls, 44 PD, 20 MSA, 12 PSP, and 5 corticobasal syndrome). We measured the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP), midbrain, and pons. Brainstem size was measured by area or length of the longitudinal axis, which we named the "one line" method. We conducted intraclass correlation coefficients to assess the extent of agreement and consistency among raters, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine diagnostic accuracy.
RESULTS
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of MCP width were excellent in sagittal and axial sections while those of SCP width were moderate. There were also excellent ICCs between raters for "one line" method of the midbrain and pons, while areas showed good ICCs. "One line" method and area of the midbrain were better than SCP width for the differential diagnosis of PSP from MSA-P and PD. In contrast, there was no clearly superior measurement for differentially diagnosing MSA-P.
CONCLUSIONS
The "one line" method was comparable with area for inter-rater agreement and diagnostic accuracy even though this was a simple and fast way.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.