MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.054

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2008

Management of penetrating war injuries: bullet/shell fragments in the sphenoid sinuses.

Shuker Sabri T

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Penetrating sphenoid sinus injuries in both war and civilian practice are rare. A review of the literature shows no reports of shell fragments or bullets in this region; hence, the rarity of the cases prompted this report.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A variety of surgical approaches--transethmoidal, transnasal trans-septal, sublabial transnasal, and endoscopic techniques--and the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of these techniques used in the delivery and management of missiles lodged in the sphenoid sinus under conditions of war are described.

RESULTS

Four shell fragments and 2 bullets were removed without increasing morbidity and with avoidance of unnecessary trauma to the area affected by the missile.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of patients with war missile injuries settled in the sphenoid sinus/base of the skull undergoing surgical treatment, there were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications. Differentiation in the approaches to this anatomic region is necessary based on whether there is a tumor or penetrating war injury.

Для цитирования: Shuker Sabri T. Management of penetrating war injuries: bullet/shell fragments in the sphenoid sinuses.. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.054.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.