medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) as a Potential Referral Metric for Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kong Jennifer A, Tamati Terrin N, Moberly Aaron C, Neukam Jonathan D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate (1) if the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) could be used to identify ears that meet cochlear implant (CI) candidacy beyond the "60/60" referral guidelines and (2) investigate the relationship between SII from patients' own hearing aids (HAs) and SII from optimally fit clinic-stock HAs such that a patient's own HAs can act as a proxy for an optimally fit HA and thus as a referral metric.
DESIGN: Prospective study of 23 participants (≥18 years) with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss who were CI candidates in at least one ear. SII-Clinic (SII-C) values were recorded with probe-microphone measures using a Verifit II device (NAL-N2 targets) with speech stimuli presented at 60 dB A during patient CI evaluation in either their own HAs or clinic-stock HAs. SII values from participants' own HAs were recorded as part of a larger research protocol, thus SII-Personal (SII-P), with probe-microphone measures using a Verifit I device (NAL-RP targets) with pink noise stimuli presented at 65 dB A. Participants that did not wear HAs did not have SII-P calculated. Data was collapsed across ears. Correlation analysis between SII and best-aided consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) was conducted. Benchmark SII values were extrapolated using a best-fit line and CI candidacy rates reflecting various aided CNC scores that could be applied across CI centers. Nested logistic regression models were used to determine if the SII-C could improve model fit beyond the revised ear-specific "60/60" referral guideline. The relationship between SII-C and SII-P was assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman correlation.
RESULTS: Correlation between SII-C and aided CNC score was r = 0.82 (p < 0.001), and the correlation between SII-P and aided CNC was r = 0.46 (p = 0.014). Extrapolated benchmarks of SII were calculated based on different CNC candidacy cutoffs, and benchmarks were able to capture at least 83% of the ears that met CNC candidacy cutoffs. SII was also found to improve model fit with word recognition score (WRS) and pure tone average (PTA) for 60% CNC candidacy cutoff (χ 2 (1) = 9.7; p = 0.002) and increased discrimination (AUC = 0.89 to AUC = 0.99). There was no significant difference between SII-C and SII-P using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.559).
CONCLUSIONS: A larger study is needed that includes more ears that do not qualify for a CI; however, the results of this study demonstrate that (1) SII has the potential to be used in conjunction with the "60/60" referral guideline for CI candidacy evaluations and (2) SII can be used as a marker of audibility across different devices, including patients' own HAs, making SII an accessible metric during HA fittings and fine tunings.
DESIGN: Prospective study of 23 participants (≥18 years) with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss who were CI candidates in at least one ear. SII-Clinic (SII-C) values were recorded with probe-microphone measures using a Verifit II device (NAL-N2 targets) with speech stimuli presented at 60 dB A during patient CI evaluation in either their own HAs or clinic-stock HAs. SII values from participants' own HAs were recorded as part of a larger research protocol, thus SII-Personal (SII-P), with probe-microphone measures using a Verifit I device (NAL-RP targets) with pink noise stimuli presented at 65 dB A. Participants that did not wear HAs did not have SII-P calculated. Data was collapsed across ears. Correlation analysis between SII and best-aided consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) was conducted. Benchmark SII values were extrapolated using a best-fit line and CI candidacy rates reflecting various aided CNC scores that could be applied across CI centers. Nested logistic regression models were used to determine if the SII-C could improve model fit beyond the revised ear-specific "60/60" referral guideline. The relationship between SII-C and SII-P was assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman correlation.
RESULTS: Correlation between SII-C and aided CNC score was r = 0.82 (p < 0.001), and the correlation between SII-P and aided CNC was r = 0.46 (p = 0.014). Extrapolated benchmarks of SII were calculated based on different CNC candidacy cutoffs, and benchmarks were able to capture at least 83% of the ears that met CNC candidacy cutoffs. SII was also found to improve model fit with word recognition score (WRS) and pure tone average (PTA) for 60% CNC candidacy cutoff (χ 2 (1) = 9.7; p = 0.002) and increased discrimination (AUC = 0.89 to AUC = 0.99). There was no significant difference between SII-C and SII-P using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.559).
CONCLUSIONS: A larger study is needed that includes more ears that do not qualify for a CI; however, the results of this study demonstrate that (1) SII has the potential to be used in conjunction with the "60/60" referral guideline for CI candidacy evaluations and (2) SII can be used as a marker of audibility across different devices, including patients' own HAs, making SII an accessible metric during HA fittings and fine tunings.