MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2026

Palatal Emetic Receptor Density in Evolutionary Perspective: A Synthesis from Neuroanatomy, Comparative Primatology, and Biological Anthropology.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Fiorillo Luca, D'Amico Cesare, Ronsivalle Vincenzo, Galletti Cosimo

Аннотация

The soft palate harbors a morphologically and functionally heterogeneous population of sensory receptors whose coordinated activation constitutes one of the most ancient and conserved protective reflexes in vertebrate biology: the emetic reflex. Despite decades of investigation into the neurochemistry and pharmacology of emesis, the quantitative topography of palatal receptor populations, comprising free nerve endings (FNEs), encapsulated mechanoreceptors, and epithelial taste receptor cells (TRCs), remains incompletely characterized, and their evolutionary significance has received comparatively little systematic attention. The present manuscript synthesizes existing neuroanatomical, histologic, and comparative data to examine how palatal receptor density and distribution may reflect adaptive pressures operating over primate evolutionary history. Drawing on receptor density estimates from histologic studies, comparative neuroanatomy across the order Primates, and the literature on evolutionary medicine and disgust psychology, it is proposed that variation in palatal receptor density among individuals and populations constitutes a measurable bio-anthropological variable relevant to dietary ecology, toxin exposure regimes, and oral processing behavior. A model of evolutionary co-calibration between palatal receptor density, dietary breadth, and disgust sensitivity is presented. Implications for biological anthropology, evolutionary medicine, and clinical practice, including craniofacial surgery and maxillofacial prosthodontics, are discussed.