Microbiome · 2025
Deciphering the coordinated roles of the host genome, duodenal mucosal genes, and microbiota in regulating complex traits in chickens.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lan Fangren, Wang Xiqiong, Zhou Qianqian, Li Xiaochang, Jin Jiaming, Zhang Wenxin, Wen Chaoliang, Wu Guiqin, Li Guangqi, Yan Yiyuan, Yang Ning, Sun Congjiao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The complex interactions between host genetics and the gut microbiome are well documented. However, the specific impacts of gene expression patterns and microbial composition on each other remain to be further explored.
RESULTS: Here, we investigated this complex interplay in a sizable population of 705 hens, employing integrative analyses to examine the relationships among the host genome, mucosal gene expression, and gut microbiota. Specific microbial taxa, such as the cecal family Christensenellaceae, which showed a heritability of 0.365, were strongly correlated with host genomic variants. We proposed a novel concept of regulatability ( r b 2 ), which was derived from h2, to quantify the cumulative effects of gene expression on the given phenotypes. The duodenal mucosal transcriptome emerged as a potent influencer of duodenal microbial taxa, with much higher r b 2 values (0.17 ± 0.01, mean ± SE) than h2 values (0.02 ± 0.00). A comparative analysis of chickens and humans revealed similar average microbiability values of genes (0.18 vs. 0.20) and significant differences in average r b 2 values of microbes (0.17 vs. 0.04). Besides, cis ( h cis 2 ) and trans heritability ( h trans 2 ) were estimated to assess the effects of genetic variations inside and outside the cis window of the gene on its expression. Higher h trans 2 values than h cis 2 values and a greater prevalence of trans-regulated genes than cis-regulated genes underscored the significant role of loci outside the cis window in shaping gene expression levels. Furthermore, our exploration of the regulatory effects of duodenal mucosal genes and the microbiota on 18 complex traits enhanced our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms, in which the CHST14 gene and its regulatory relationships with Lactobacillus salivarius jointly facilitated the deposition of abdominal fat by modulating the concentration of bile salt hydrolase, and further triglycerides, total cholesterol, and free fatty acids absorption and metabolism.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted a novel concept of r b 2 to quantify the phenotypic variance attributed to gene expression and emphasize the superior role of intestinal mucosal gene expressions over host genomic variations in elucidating host‒microbe interactions for complex traits. This understanding could assist in devising strategies to modulate host-microbe interactions, ultimately improving economic traits in chickens.
RESULTS: Here, we investigated this complex interplay in a sizable population of 705 hens, employing integrative analyses to examine the relationships among the host genome, mucosal gene expression, and gut microbiota. Specific microbial taxa, such as the cecal family Christensenellaceae, which showed a heritability of 0.365, were strongly correlated with host genomic variants. We proposed a novel concept of regulatability ( r b 2 ), which was derived from h2, to quantify the cumulative effects of gene expression on the given phenotypes. The duodenal mucosal transcriptome emerged as a potent influencer of duodenal microbial taxa, with much higher r b 2 values (0.17 ± 0.01, mean ± SE) than h2 values (0.02 ± 0.00). A comparative analysis of chickens and humans revealed similar average microbiability values of genes (0.18 vs. 0.20) and significant differences in average r b 2 values of microbes (0.17 vs. 0.04). Besides, cis ( h cis 2 ) and trans heritability ( h trans 2 ) were estimated to assess the effects of genetic variations inside and outside the cis window of the gene on its expression. Higher h trans 2 values than h cis 2 values and a greater prevalence of trans-regulated genes than cis-regulated genes underscored the significant role of loci outside the cis window in shaping gene expression levels. Furthermore, our exploration of the regulatory effects of duodenal mucosal genes and the microbiota on 18 complex traits enhanced our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms, in which the CHST14 gene and its regulatory relationships with Lactobacillus salivarius jointly facilitated the deposition of abdominal fat by modulating the concentration of bile salt hydrolase, and further triglycerides, total cholesterol, and free fatty acids absorption and metabolism.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted a novel concept of r b 2 to quantify the phenotypic variance attributed to gene expression and emphasize the superior role of intestinal mucosal gene expressions over host genomic variations in elucidating host‒microbe interactions for complex traits. This understanding could assist in devising strategies to modulate host-microbe interactions, ultimately improving economic traits in chickens.