International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2008
Characterization of vascular reactivity in dorsal hand veins after oral rosiglitazone treatment in healthy subjects.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schindler C, Ferrario C M, Jatzke C, Ahner K, Brosnihan K B, Bramlage P, Maywald U, Oertel R, Boecking W, Kirch W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In clinical studies with diabetic patients thiazolidinediones have been shown to restore abnormal vascular function which might be attributed to improved blood sugar control or to restoration of vascular endothelium and smooth muscle responsiveness. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether rosiglitazone modulates vascular responsiveness to different vasoactive agents and exerts renin-angiotensin-system (RAS)-inhibiting properties in healthy subjects in vivo.
METHODS: 24 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive either rosiglitazone or placebo. Venoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) and phenylephrine, and endothelium-dependent response to histamine and insulin, and endothelium-independent response to glyceroltrinitrate were compared using the dorsal hand vein compliance method. Effects on the RAS were investigated by plasma level determinations of Ang II and angiotensin-(1-7). Treatment effects on the systemic arterial system were investigated by standardized pulse-wave-analysis.
RESULTS: Rosiglitazone significantly inhibited venoconstrictor responses to Ang II by 19% (-70% vs. -51% constriction, p = 0.034) and in the presence of rosiglitazone the ED80 for phenylephrine was increased (ED80: 317 A+/- 86 ng vs. 531 A+/- 102 ng; p = 0.010). Rosiglitazone treatment was without effect on endothelium-dependent dilation, blood pressure, pulse-wave-velocity and plasma angiotensin peptide levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The data of the present study in veins of healthy subjects are consistent with data from in vitro and animal studies supporting a direct effect of rosiglitazone on venous tone by modulation of the vascular smooth muscle response via AT1-receptor-downregulation.
METHODS: 24 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive either rosiglitazone or placebo. Venoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) and phenylephrine, and endothelium-dependent response to histamine and insulin, and endothelium-independent response to glyceroltrinitrate were compared using the dorsal hand vein compliance method. Effects on the RAS were investigated by plasma level determinations of Ang II and angiotensin-(1-7). Treatment effects on the systemic arterial system were investigated by standardized pulse-wave-analysis.
RESULTS: Rosiglitazone significantly inhibited venoconstrictor responses to Ang II by 19% (-70% vs. -51% constriction, p = 0.034) and in the presence of rosiglitazone the ED80 for phenylephrine was increased (ED80: 317 A+/- 86 ng vs. 531 A+/- 102 ng; p = 0.010). Rosiglitazone treatment was without effect on endothelium-dependent dilation, blood pressure, pulse-wave-velocity and plasma angiotensin peptide levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The data of the present study in veins of healthy subjects are consistent with data from in vitro and animal studies supporting a direct effect of rosiglitazone on venous tone by modulation of the vascular smooth muscle response via AT1-receptor-downregulation.