Gastroenterology · 1994
The yield of a second screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in average-risk persons after one negative examination.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rex D K, Lehman G A, Ulbright T M, Smith J J, Hawes R H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The American Cancer Society recommends that asymptomatic persons aged > or = 50 years undergo sigmoidoscopy every 3-5 years. However, the yield of a second examination 3 years later in persons who are initially negative is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of a second flexible sigmoidoscopy in average-risk persons aged > or = 50 years after an initial negative examination.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine asymptomatic, average-risk persons who had undergone a negative screening flexible sigmoidoscopy examination at age > or = 50 years underwent a second examination at least 2 years later (mean, 3.4 years).
RESULTS: The second examination found adenomas in 15 (6%) screenees, but no cancers or large (> 1 cm) or severely dysplastic adenomas were detected. Persons aged > or = 60 years at the time of the second examination were more likely (10%) to have adenomas than those < 60 years (3%) (odds ratio, 3.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-12.2), but no advanced lesions were found in persons aged > or = 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the American Cancer Society should consider changing its recommendation for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic, average-risk persons to 5-year intervals after a negative examination.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine asymptomatic, average-risk persons who had undergone a negative screening flexible sigmoidoscopy examination at age > or = 50 years underwent a second examination at least 2 years later (mean, 3.4 years).
RESULTS: The second examination found adenomas in 15 (6%) screenees, but no cancers or large (> 1 cm) or severely dysplastic adenomas were detected. Persons aged > or = 60 years at the time of the second examination were more likely (10%) to have adenomas than those < 60 years (3%) (odds ratio, 3.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-12.2), but no advanced lesions were found in persons aged > or = 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the American Cancer Society should consider changing its recommendation for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic, average-risk persons to 5-year intervals after a negative examination.