BJPsych open · 2026
Prevalence and determinants of diabetes-related psychological distress in a tertiary care setting in Tamil Nadu, India: cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aravind Gowri, Nathan Lawrence Soosai, Kumar Senthil R, Subramanium Aravindakumar, Aravindakumar Gowri Karthikeyan, Thirunavukkarasu Dhasaratharaman, Tromans Samuel J, Shankar Rohit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diabetes distress, whereby people with diabetes experience distressing psychological symptoms associated with living with their condition, is an emerging problem in India. Diabetes distress leads to self-care deficits, suboptimal glycaemic control (which can lead to increasing risks of complications) and impaired quality of life.
AIMS: To determine the burden of diabetes distress and its associated factors in an Indian tertiary care centre in Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India, covering a population of 1.25 million.
METHOD: This prospective observational study involved a structured questionnaire covering demographic and clinical details, which was given to patients. The Diabetes Distress Scale 17 (DDS-17) was used to assess diabetes distress levels. The DDS-17 also measures four subdomains: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress and diabetes-related interpersonal distress. Patients were divided into two groups based on their DDS-17 score: no diabetes distress (DDS-17 score <2) versus diabetes distress (DDS-17 score ≥2) and compared. Correlation analysis, chi-squared tests and t-tests were used, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Of 1019 respondents (mean age 56 years; 59.6% male, 40.4% female), diabetes distress was reported in 24.4% (n = 249). Factors significantly associated with higher DDS-17 scores were younger age (<45 years) (P < 0.0001), long-standing diabetes (>10 years) (P < 0.0001), and smoking and alcohol (P < 0.05). Significant protective factors for diabetes distress included working, daily exercise, no comorbidities and medical insurance cover (P < 0.05). Significant positive correlation between DDS-17 score and all four subdomains was observed (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for routine psychological screening and holistic management strategies in diabetes care, to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
AIMS: To determine the burden of diabetes distress and its associated factors in an Indian tertiary care centre in Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India, covering a population of 1.25 million.
METHOD: This prospective observational study involved a structured questionnaire covering demographic and clinical details, which was given to patients. The Diabetes Distress Scale 17 (DDS-17) was used to assess diabetes distress levels. The DDS-17 also measures four subdomains: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress and diabetes-related interpersonal distress. Patients were divided into two groups based on their DDS-17 score: no diabetes distress (DDS-17 score <2) versus diabetes distress (DDS-17 score ≥2) and compared. Correlation analysis, chi-squared tests and t-tests were used, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Of 1019 respondents (mean age 56 years; 59.6% male, 40.4% female), diabetes distress was reported in 24.4% (n = 249). Factors significantly associated with higher DDS-17 scores were younger age (<45 years) (P < 0.0001), long-standing diabetes (>10 years) (P < 0.0001), and smoking and alcohol (P < 0.05). Significant protective factors for diabetes distress included working, daily exercise, no comorbidities and medical insurance cover (P < 0.05). Significant positive correlation between DDS-17 score and all four subdomains was observed (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for routine psychological screening and holistic management strategies in diabetes care, to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.