DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.014
Quantitative 3-D analysis of GFAP labeled astrocytes from fluorescence confocal images.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
There is a need for effective computational methods for quantifying the three-dimensional (3-D) spatial distribution, cellular arbor morphologies, and the morphological diversity of brain astrocytes to support quantitative studies of astrocytes in health, injury, and disease.
NEW METHOD: Confocal fluorescence microscopy of multiplex-labeled (GFAP, DAPI) brain tissue is used to perform imaging of astrocytes in their tissue context. The proposed computational method identifies the astrocyte cell nuclei, and reconstructs their arbors using a local priority based parallel (LPP) tracing algorithm. Quantitative arbor measurements are extracted using Scorcioni's L-measure, and profiled by unsupervised harmonic co-clustering to reveal the morphological diversity.
RESULTS
The proposed method identifies astrocyte nuclei, generates 3-D reconstructions of their arbors, and extracts quantitative arbor measurements, enabling a morphological grouping of the cell population.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS
Our method enables comprehensive spatial and morphological profiling of astrocyte populations in brain tissue for the first time, and overcomes limitations of prior methods. Visual proofreading of the results indicate a >95% accuracy in identifying astrocyte nuclei. The arbor reconstructions exhibited 3.2% fewer erroneous jumps in tracing, and 17.7% fewer false segments compared to the widely used fast-marching method that resulted in 9% jumps and 20.8% false segments.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed method can be used for large-scale quantitative studies of brain astrocyte distribution and morphology.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.