Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2009
Distribution of antibody titer against Salmonella enterica among healthy individuals in nepal.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pokhrel Bharat M, Karmacharya Rajendra, Mishra Shyam K, Koirala Janak
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Enteric fever is an endemic problem in Nepal and Widal agglutination test is widely used for its diagnosis but a normal baseline titer in healthy population and cutoff values have not been established.
METHODS: We measured average baseline antibody titers against "O" and "H" antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and "H" antigens of serotypes Paratyphi A and Paratyphi B among apparently healthy blood donors in Nepal. The antibody titers were measured using Standard Widal Confirmatory Quantitative Tube test.
RESULTS: Among the 100 blood samples collected from healthy volunteers, 62 individuals had significant antibody titers (> or = 1:20) against one of the four antigens against S. enterica. Among 54 samples with an anti-O titer against serotype Typhi, 15 and 36 samples had titers of > or = 1:60 and > or = 1:40, respectively. A significant proportion (12% of all) had anti-O titer of > or = 1:80. Similarly, among the 59 samples demonstrating anti-H titers of > or = 1:20 to S. enterica serotype Typhi, 29 had a titer of > or = 1:80 and 12 had 1:160. For S. enterica serotypes Paratyphi A and B, anti-H titers of > or = 1:20 were found only in 12% and 3%, respectively, of all samples tested.
CONCLUSION: When a single Widal agglutination titer is used for the diagnosis of enteric fever, it will be more appropriate to change the currently used cutoff levels against S. enterica serotype Typhi to > 1:80 for anti-O and > 1:160 for anti-H titers for Nepal.
METHODS: We measured average baseline antibody titers against "O" and "H" antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and "H" antigens of serotypes Paratyphi A and Paratyphi B among apparently healthy blood donors in Nepal. The antibody titers were measured using Standard Widal Confirmatory Quantitative Tube test.
RESULTS: Among the 100 blood samples collected from healthy volunteers, 62 individuals had significant antibody titers (> or = 1:20) against one of the four antigens against S. enterica. Among 54 samples with an anti-O titer against serotype Typhi, 15 and 36 samples had titers of > or = 1:60 and > or = 1:40, respectively. A significant proportion (12% of all) had anti-O titer of > or = 1:80. Similarly, among the 59 samples demonstrating anti-H titers of > or = 1:20 to S. enterica serotype Typhi, 29 had a titer of > or = 1:80 and 12 had 1:160. For S. enterica serotypes Paratyphi A and B, anti-H titers of > or = 1:20 were found only in 12% and 3%, respectively, of all samples tested.
CONCLUSION: When a single Widal agglutination titer is used for the diagnosis of enteric fever, it will be more appropriate to change the currently used cutoff levels against S. enterica serotype Typhi to > 1:80 for anti-O and > 1:160 for anti-H titers for Nepal.