Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2022
Relation Between URIC Acid Levels and Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Diabetic Patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shabana Hosameldeen S, Allam Mahmoud A, Nassar Youssef A, Awad Amgad, Naguib Magdy M, Elgendy Abdelaleem A, Elmahdi Essam
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is frequently seen in diabetic patients. Elevated levels of uric acid (UA) were also reported in diabetic patients. No study assessed the relation between SCH and UA levels in diabetic patients. We aimed to evaluate this relation and the association of both conditions with other clinical and laboratory parameters in diabetic patients.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 100 T2DM patients in addition to 50 age and sex matched healthy controls. Diabetic patients comprised 50 patients with SCH and 50 euthyroid patients. All participants were subjected to careful history taking, thorough clinical examination and standard laboratory work up. The performed investigations included fasting and postprandial blood sugar, fasting insulin levels, HbA1c levels, thyroid hormones (FT3, FT4 and TSH), renal profile and serum UA.
RESULTS: Comparison between the studied groups regarding serum UA levels revealed significantly higher levels in the diabetic group (5.4 ± 1.9 versus 4.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl, p<0.001). SCH + DM patients had significantly higher UA levels in comparison to DM group (6.1 ± 1.8 versus 4.8 ± 1.7 mg/dl, p<0.001) and control group (6.1 ± 1.8 versus 4.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl, p<0.001). SCH + DM patients had significantly higher HbA1c levels (8.9 ± 1.1 versus 7.6 ± 1.3%, p<0.001), HOMA-IR (3.9 ± 0.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.0, p<0.001) and UA levels (6.1 ± 1.8 versus 4.8 ± 1.7, p<0.001). Correlation analysis identified a significant direct correlation between serum UA and HOMA-IR in DM + SCH patients (r=0.4,p=0.004). In univariate analysis, presence of SCH [OR (95% CI): 2.57 (1.07-6.15), p=0.034] and nephropathy [OR (95% CI): 4.57 (1.77-11.8), p=0.002] was significant predictors of higher (upper tertile) UA in the studied patients. However, in multivariate analysis, only nephropathy [OR (95% CI): 4.25 (1.62-11.17), p=0.003] continued to be significant while SCH showed a marginal trend [OR (95% CI): 0.43 (0.17-1.08), p=0.073].
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests an association between SCH and increased UA levels in diabetic patients.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 100 T2DM patients in addition to 50 age and sex matched healthy controls. Diabetic patients comprised 50 patients with SCH and 50 euthyroid patients. All participants were subjected to careful history taking, thorough clinical examination and standard laboratory work up. The performed investigations included fasting and postprandial blood sugar, fasting insulin levels, HbA1c levels, thyroid hormones (FT3, FT4 and TSH), renal profile and serum UA.
RESULTS: Comparison between the studied groups regarding serum UA levels revealed significantly higher levels in the diabetic group (5.4 ± 1.9 versus 4.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl, p<0.001). SCH + DM patients had significantly higher UA levels in comparison to DM group (6.1 ± 1.8 versus 4.8 ± 1.7 mg/dl, p<0.001) and control group (6.1 ± 1.8 versus 4.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl, p<0.001). SCH + DM patients had significantly higher HbA1c levels (8.9 ± 1.1 versus 7.6 ± 1.3%, p<0.001), HOMA-IR (3.9 ± 0.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.0, p<0.001) and UA levels (6.1 ± 1.8 versus 4.8 ± 1.7, p<0.001). Correlation analysis identified a significant direct correlation between serum UA and HOMA-IR in DM + SCH patients (r=0.4,p=0.004). In univariate analysis, presence of SCH [OR (95% CI): 2.57 (1.07-6.15), p=0.034] and nephropathy [OR (95% CI): 4.57 (1.77-11.8), p=0.002] was significant predictors of higher (upper tertile) UA in the studied patients. However, in multivariate analysis, only nephropathy [OR (95% CI): 4.25 (1.62-11.17), p=0.003] continued to be significant while SCH showed a marginal trend [OR (95% CI): 0.43 (0.17-1.08), p=0.073].
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests an association between SCH and increased UA levels in diabetic patients.