Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2015
Conventional versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ng Alex Lap Ki, Chan Tommy C Y, Cheng Arthur C K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effect of conventional corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) with accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in treatment of keratoconus.
DESIGN: A comparative interventional study was employed.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants were consecutive cases of progressive keratoconus receiving either conventional (3 mW/cm(2) irradiance for 30 min) or accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm(2) irradiance for 10 min).
METHODS: Clinical and topographic parameters were compared between the two groups. Postoperative corneal stromal demarcation line was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and topographic parameters such as corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry (Kmean), demarcation line depth were gathered from medical records.
RESULTS: There were a total of 26 eyes with an average follow up of 13.9 ± 6.3 months. Fourteen eyes received conventional CXL, and 12 eyes had accelerated CXL. In the conventional CXL group, CDVA improved significantly (P = 0.021). There was also a significant reduction in Kmax (P = 0.003) and Kmean (P = 0.002). In the accelerated CXL group, no significant changes were found in CDVA (P = 0.395), Kmax (P = 0.388) and Kmean (P = 0.952) postoperatively. A significantly greater reduction in Kmax and Kmean were seen in conventional CXL compared to its accelerated counterpart (P = 0.001 and 0.015, respectively). The demarcation line was deeper in eyes with conventional CXL (P = 0.013), and the depth correlated significantly with the change in Kmean (r = -0.432, P = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: Conventional and accelerated CXL are effective in stabilizing keratoconus progression after a mean of 12 months. Patients undergoing conventional CXL showed clinical improvement with greater corneal flattening, which correlated with a deeper corneal stromal demarcation line. This current study is the first to report such correlation.
DESIGN: A comparative interventional study was employed.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants were consecutive cases of progressive keratoconus receiving either conventional (3 mW/cm(2) irradiance for 30 min) or accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm(2) irradiance for 10 min).
METHODS: Clinical and topographic parameters were compared between the two groups. Postoperative corneal stromal demarcation line was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and topographic parameters such as corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry (Kmean), demarcation line depth were gathered from medical records.
RESULTS: There were a total of 26 eyes with an average follow up of 13.9 ± 6.3 months. Fourteen eyes received conventional CXL, and 12 eyes had accelerated CXL. In the conventional CXL group, CDVA improved significantly (P = 0.021). There was also a significant reduction in Kmax (P = 0.003) and Kmean (P = 0.002). In the accelerated CXL group, no significant changes were found in CDVA (P = 0.395), Kmax (P = 0.388) and Kmean (P = 0.952) postoperatively. A significantly greater reduction in Kmax and Kmean were seen in conventional CXL compared to its accelerated counterpart (P = 0.001 and 0.015, respectively). The demarcation line was deeper in eyes with conventional CXL (P = 0.013), and the depth correlated significantly with the change in Kmean (r = -0.432, P = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: Conventional and accelerated CXL are effective in stabilizing keratoconus progression after a mean of 12 months. Patients undergoing conventional CXL showed clinical improvement with greater corneal flattening, which correlated with a deeper corneal stromal demarcation line. This current study is the first to report such correlation.