MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000000260

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2014

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict progression in patients with keratoconus.

Karaca Emine Esra, Özmen Mehmet Cüneyt, Ekici Feyzahan, Yüksel Erdem, Türkoğlu Zülal

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a new potential predictor of systemic inflammation in several diseases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate NLR in patients with keratoconus.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study included 54 patients with keratoconus and 25 age- and sex-matched control subjects. All participants underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination and corneal topography. The patients were divided into progressive and nonprogressive keratoconus groups on the basis of topographic parameters. Serum samples were obtained from all subjects, and the NLR was calculated.

RESULTS

The NLR was 3.27 ± 1.37 in the progressive keratoconus group versus 1.87 ± 0.39 and 1.87 ± 0.52 in the nonprogressive and control groups, respectively (P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between NLR and progression (P < 0.05). In the receiver-operating characteristic analysis, an NLR ≥ 2.24 predicted the presence of progression with 79% sensitivity and 81% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The NLR is a simple and inexpensive marker of systemic inflammation. The NLR was found to be higher in patients with progressive keratoconus than in the nonprogressive group and controls.

Для цитирования: Karaca Emine Esra, Özmen Mehmet Cüneyt, Ekici Feyzahan, Yüksel Erdem, Türkoğlu Zülal. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict progression in patients with keratoconus.. Cornea. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000260.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.